randomized into two groups

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "randomized into two groups" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in the context of research or experiments where participants are assigned to different groups randomly. Example: "In the clinical trial, participants were randomized into two groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the new medication."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The patients were randomized into two groups using random number tables generated online (http://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/randomize1/).

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

They were randomized into two groups.

Clinical Phytoscience

Patients were randomized into two groups.

International Journal of Surgery

Animals were randomized into two groups, 10 animals each.

The Journal of Emergency Medicine

All participants of the study are randomized into two groups using a computer-based software.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Patients were randomized into two groups by the concealed envelope technique.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

The bronchoscope was completely withdrawn at this point and the animals randomized into two groups.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

The sample was randomized into two groups: Biofeedback group (Bfb Group and Controll group.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

The animals were subsequently randomized into two groups: low tidal volume (LVt) ventilation or APRV.

Intensive Care Medicine Experimental

Population: One hundred and eighty primiparas were randomized into two groups.

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a study design, explicitly state the method used for randomization (e.g., using a random number generator) to enhance clarity and reproducibility.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that participants were "randomized into two groups" without detailing the randomization process. Providing specifics, such as mentioning the use of a random number table or a computer-based algorithm, adds rigor and transparency to your description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "randomized into two groups" functions as a descriptive term in research methodology. It specifies how participants were assigned to different experimental conditions. As Ludwig AI underlines, the phrase is usable in written English and frequently appears in scientific literature.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "randomized into two groups" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to describe participant allocation in research studies. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely accepted. Its primary context is scientific, and it signifies a random assignment process to create comparable groups. When using this phrase, it's best practice to specify the randomization method for clarity and reproducibility. Remember to avoid the common error of simply stating the phrase without detailing the process. Alternatives such as "assigned randomly to two groups" or "divided into two groups at random" can be used for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

divided into two groups at random

Emphasizes the randomness of the division, rather than the process of randomization itself.

assigned randomly to two groups

Focuses on the act of assigning participants, highlighting the random nature of the allocation.

allocated to two groups by randomization

Highlights the use of randomization as the method of allocation.

separated into two groups through randomization

Stresses the separation of participants into distinct groups via randomization.

partitioned into two groups using a random method

Focuses on the partitioning action and highlights a random method of division.

placed randomly in one of two groups

Underscores the element of chance in the group placement.

subjected to a two-group randomization process

Highlights the procedure of random assignment into two distinct groups.

underwent randomization into two arms

Uses "arms" as a term often associated with treatment groups in a clinical trial.

stratified randomly across two groups

Implies an initial stratification before the randomization process takes place.

distributed at random between two groups

Focuses on the even distribution of subjects across the two groups based on a random process.

FAQs

How do you use "randomized into two groups" in a sentence?

You can use "randomized into two groups" to describe the process of assigning participants to different groups randomly, such as "The patients were "randomized into two groups": a treatment group and a control group."

What are some alternatives to "randomized into two groups"?

Some alternatives include "assigned randomly to two groups", "divided into two groups at random", or "allocated to two groups by randomization", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "randomized into two groups" or "randomly assigned to two groups"?

Both "randomized into two groups" and "randomly assigned to two groups" are correct. The choice depends on the desired emphasis; the latter highlights the act of assignment, while the former focuses on the process of randomization.

What does it mean when a study says participants were "randomized into two groups"?

It means that participants were assigned to either a treatment group or a control group using a random method. This helps to ensure that the groups are as similar as possible at the start of the study, reducing bias and strengthening the validity of the results.