random modifications

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "random modifications" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe changes or alterations that are made without a specific pattern or purpose. Example: "The software update included random modifications that improved performance but also introduced some unexpected bugs."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Mutation introduces random modifications in the population, helps to preserve diversity and prevents premature convergence of the algorithm.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

Mutation introduces random modifications in the population, it helps preserve the diversity and prevent the algorithm from the premature convergence.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

To account for the random variability of precipitation data and to avoid a trend that could affect crop growth and development, the random modifications were replicated 32 times for each individual weather year and for each inaccuracy case that was considered.

Ecological Modelling

We took the average time point errors, accuracies, and CPU time over 10 random modifications with several o i s.

BioMed Research International

As well as the driver mutations that increase cell growth, colony cells can also develop 'passenger mutations', which may be regarded as random modifications that may not cause a noticeable difference in the cells' behavior.

eLife

It has been estimated that 50 70% of random modifications in amino acid sequence are neutral, 30 50% are strongly deleterious, and 0.01 0.5% are beneficial to protein function (Bloom & Arnold, 2009).

Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Mutation Mutation operator makes a new mutated chromosome by making a random modification.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

Random modification could produce a heterogeneous mixture of conjugated proteins, consisting of different number of modifier molecules bound to various sites of the protein.

Chemistry Central Journal

An approximation for Y1a and Y1b is to assume that they may be started uniformly during an operating period[16], which is sometimes called random modification of Y[8] or equilibrium excess distribution[7].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The mutation steps correspond to a random modification of the pattern of connections.

Plosone

A move quality from −1 to 0 is considered bad (i.e., good edges are more likely to be removed than bad edges), 0 is random (random modification), and 0 to 1 is good (i.e., good edges more likely to stay than bad edges).

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing experimental results, use "random modifications" to precisely indicate changes introduced without a predetermined pattern or intent. This enhances clarity and avoids implying deliberate manipulation where none exists.

Common error

Be careful not to use "random modifications" when you actually mean "unexplained variations". The former implies an action, while the latter simply indicates a lack of understanding of the cause.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "random modifications" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "random" acts as an adjective modifying the noun "modifications". It describes alterations that lack a predictable pattern or specific intent. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "random modifications" is a grammatically correct and commonly used term, particularly in scientific contexts, to describe changes or alterations that are made without a specific pattern or purpose. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. While alternatives like "arbitrary changes" or "haphazard alterations" exist, "random modifications" precisely conveys the lack of a predetermined system, which makes it very helpful in research reports or scientific documentation. Always be mindful of the context to avoid implying intent where none exists.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

arbitrary changes

Emphasizes the lack of a specific reason or system behind the changes.

haphazard alterations

Highlights the unsystematic and disorganized nature of the alterations.

unpredictable adjustments

Focuses on the inability to foresee or anticipate the adjustments being made.

chance variations

Indicates that the variations are due to luck or unforeseen circumstances.

stochastic variations

Highlights that the variations depend on statistical probability.

unintentional modifications

Focuses on that changes are not a result of a purpose.

fortuitous modifications

It emphasizes that the changes had a positive effect.

incidental alterations

Stresses that the alterations occur as a secondary or minor effect.

undesigned changes

Focuses on changes that occur without intention or purpose.

aimless adjustments

Highlights that the adjustments are not goal-oriented or purposeful.

FAQs

How can I use "random modifications" in a scientific context?

In scientific writing, "random modifications" can describe changes or alterations introduced without a specific, pre-planned methodology. For example, you might say, "The algorithm introduced "random modifications" to the data set to test its robustness".

What are some alternatives to using "random modifications"?

Depending on the specific meaning you want to convey, you could use alternatives such as "arbitrary changes", "haphazard alterations", or "unpredictable adjustments".

Is it more appropriate to say "random modifications" or "stochastic modifications"?

While both terms relate to changes occurring without a fixed pattern, ""random modifications"" is generally used for changes lacking any discernible structure, while "stochastic modifications" implies changes based on statistical probability. The choice depends on whether there's an underlying probabilistic model.

Can "random modifications" be considered a positive or negative aspect in research?

The effect of ""random modifications"" depends entirely on the context. In some cases, they might be used to introduce variability and test robustness, while in other cases, they might represent unwanted noise or error.