radical claim

USAGE SUMMARY

"radical claim" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are talking about an assertion that departs significantly from the accepted norm or standard. For example: "The senator's argument contained a radical claim that no changes were needed to the existing healthcare system."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

19 human-written examples

This is a radical claim, but it's largely unsubstantiated.

The New York Times - Books

Freud's radical claim was that all our dreams – even the most terrifying – are wishes.

The Guardian - Arts

Putnam's first attempt to provide a more realist understanding of quantum mechanics invoked the radical claim that logic is empirical.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It consists of 27 brief and pointed declarations that extol papal primacy and even includes the radical claim that the pope had the right to depose emperors.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This is a radical claim; poetry is nearly always thought of as a refinement of longer, coarser forms — the novel, memoir, history, the essay.

The New Yorker

It sets out a programme for change that is rooted in human needs but it makes the radical claim that these needs are not primarily greedy and selfish ones.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

41 human-written examples

But Wilson also makes some radical claims about the origins of our eusocial natures.

The New York Times - Books

Quite the reverse: "She's a liberal humanist – and she's become more radical," claims Stafford-Clark.

Independent

Taken together, those are radical claims, and Ms Greer does not shy from their equally radical consequences, proposing, for example, paid housework and paid mothering.

The Economist

What is more, after having assumed control of 21 of the SRS' former seats in the national assembly, the Progressives can now confidently rebut Radical claims that they are an illegitimate and unrepresentative grouping with no electoral support.

The Economist

Every journalist in the United States is put at risk by the novel, and sometimes even radical, claims that the government has introduced in the course of the sentencing process.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "radical claim", ensure that the context clearly indicates why the claim is considered radical – is it due to its departure from established norms, its potential consequences, or its lack of supporting evidence? Provide enough context for your audience to understand the claim's significance.

Common error

Avoid labeling a claim as "radical" simply for emphasis. A truly radical claim challenges fundamental assumptions or principles. Ensure the claim genuinely warrants the label, or you risk diminishing its impact and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "radical claim" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as the object or subject of a verb. It identifies an assertion that is notably different from what is generally accepted. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is frequently used to introduce or describe a proposition that deviates significantly from established norms.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "radical claim" is a common noun phrase used to describe an assertion that significantly deviates from accepted norms. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and versatile usage across news, science, and encyclopedic contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context clarifies why the claim is considered "radical". Alternatives like "revolutionary assertion" or "unconventional argument" can be used depending on the specific nuance intended. Be cautious of overstating a claim's radical nature, as true radicalism involves challenging fundamental assumptions. This phrase can be found in authoritative sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and Encyclopedia Britannica.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

revolutionary assertion

Emphasizes the transformative nature of the claim, suggesting it could lead to significant changes.

unconventional argument

Highlights the departure from established norms in the reasoning or justification.

groundbreaking proposition

Focuses on the innovative and potentially pioneering quality of the statement.

bold assertion

Stresses the confident and audacious nature of the statement.

sweeping statement

Emphasizes the broad and comprehensive scope of the claim.

contentious declaration

Highlights the potential for disagreement and debate arising from the statement.

unorthodox position

Focuses on the non-traditional and unconventional nature of the viewpoint.

extreme view

Highlights the intensity of the belief being expressed.

unsubstantiated allegation

Highlights a claim that lacks the necessary proof or evidence to support it.

provocative statement

Emphasizes the intent to elicit a reaction or spark discussion.

FAQs

How can I use "radical claim" in a sentence?

You can use "radical claim" to describe a statement that significantly deviates from accepted norms. For example: "The scientist presented a "radical claim" about the nature of dark matter."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "radical claim"?

Depending on the nuance you want to convey, you could use alternatives like "revolutionary assertion", "unconventional argument", or "bold assertion".

When is it appropriate to describe something as a "radical claim"?

Use "radical claim" when the statement challenges established beliefs, proposes a significant change, or lacks conventional support. It suggests a departure from the norm that is likely to provoke discussion or disagreement.

What is the difference between a "radical claim" and a "bold assertion"?

While both phrases suggest a confident statement, a "radical claim" specifically implies that the statement deviates significantly from accepted norms. A "bold assertion" might simply be a confident statement of something already believed, even if not yet proven, but a "radical claim" is a departure from traditional thinking.