radical change

USAGE SUMMARY

'radical change' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to refer to a sudden or drastic transformation. For example: "The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked a radical change in how we do business."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We're opposing radical change".

The New Yorker

Radical change is required.

The Economist

Radical change was called for.

The New York Times

The government promised radical change.

The Economist

RADICAL CHANGE 4 Energy savings.

The New York Times

Mr Charest promised radical change.

The Economist

This was a radical change.

The New York Times

That's a radical change.

The New York Times

All three have eschewed radical change.

The Economist

It would be a radical change.

The New York Times

"It was a radical change," Corrigan said.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "radical change" when you want to emphasize a significant and transformative shift, often implying a departure from established norms or practices.

Common error

Avoid using "radical change" when a simpler term like "significant change" or "improvement" would suffice. Reserve it for situations where the transformation is truly fundamental and far-reaching.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "radical change" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. It is used to denote a significant and fundamental alteration.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "radical change" is a widely used and grammatically sound noun phrase that signifies a fundamental transformation. Ludwig AI confirms that the expression is accurate and appropriate for use in writing. It appears most frequently in news and media contexts, where it's used to describe significant shifts in various domains. While synonyms like "sweeping transformation" or "revolutionary shift" exist, "radical change" is a direct and effective way to convey the magnitude of an alteration. Remember to reserve the term for situations where the change is truly substantial and transformative, avoiding overuse in contexts where simpler terms would suffice. Overall, "radical change" is a valuable phrase to have in your vocabulary for describing impactful and fundamental shifts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sweeping transformation

Emphasizes the broad scope and impact of the change.

revolutionary shift

Highlights the transformative and disruptive nature of the change.

fundamental alteration

Focuses on the basic and essential aspects that are being modified.

complete overhaul

Suggests a thorough and comprehensive renovation or restructuring.

profound modification

Indicates a deep and significant adjustment.

drastic adjustment

Conveys a sense of urgency and significant impact.

total restructuring

Implies a complete reorganization of a system or entity.

far-reaching reform

Stresses the extensive impact and consequences of the change.

paradigm shift

Highlights a change in fundamental assumptions or underlying principles.

ground-breaking innovation

Focuses on the introduction of new methods or ideas that deviate significantly from the norm.

FAQs

How can I use "radical change" in a sentence?

You can use "radical change" to describe a fundamental shift in various contexts. For example, "The company implemented a "radical change" in its marketing strategy" or "The new law brought about a "radical change" in the healthcare system".

What are some synonyms for "radical change"?

Alternatives to "radical change" include "sweeping transformation", "revolutionary shift", or "fundamental alteration", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "radical change" instead of "major change"?

"Radical change" implies a more fundamental and disruptive shift than "major change". Use "radical change" when the transformation involves a complete departure from previous methods or principles, whereas "major change" can refer to a significant but less transformative adjustment.

Is "radical change" always a positive thing?

Not necessarily. While "radical change" can lead to positive outcomes, it can also be disruptive or have unintended consequences. The term itself is neutral and does not inherently imply a positive or negative result. Its impact depends on the context and implementation.