Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

quickly enough for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "quickly enough for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is done at a sufficient speed to meet a particular requirement or expectation. Example: "She completed the project quickly enough for us to meet the deadline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(The heat will not penetrate quickly enough for safe heating).

News & Media

The New York Times

But things were not moving quickly enough for Mr. Smith.

News & Media

The New York Times

(The heat won't penetrate quickly enough for safe heating).

News & Media

The New York Times

A ban cannot happen quickly enough for Lynda Mitchell.

News & Media

Independent

The help can't come quickly enough for travelers.

News & Media

The Guardian

Change isn't coming quickly enough for many residents, though.

Paris and 2018 cannot come quickly enough for either side.

But not quickly enough for Cambridge, you suspect.

Things weren't happening quickly enough for him, though, and this made him unhappy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Since then, Mr. Baczkowski said, "things have developed quickly, but not quickly enough for us".

News & Media

The New York Times

If so, will it happen quickly enough for an American public weary of the war?

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "quickly enough for", ensure that the context clearly specifies the requirement or expectation that the speed is meeting. This adds clarity and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "quickly enough for" without explicitly stating what the speed needs to be sufficient for. Vague usage can leave the reader guessing and weaken your message. For example, instead of saying 'The response was quickly enough', specify 'The response was quickly enough for us to meet the deadline'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quickly enough for" functions as an adverbial modifier, specifying the degree to which an action must be performed to satisfy a given condition. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correctly used to indicate that something is done at a sufficient speed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

17%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "quickly enough for" is a common and grammatically correct adverbial modifier used to express that something is done with sufficient speed to meet a particular requirement. As Ludwig AI states, it's perfectly usable in written English. It is frequently found in news and media, science, and academic contexts, and is considered to have a neutral register. While alternatives such as "sufficiently fast for" or "rapidly enough for" exist, it is crucial to ensure that the specific requirement being met is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. Ludwig’s analysis indicates that this phrase is a reliable and versatile tool for expressing temporal adequacy.

FAQs

How can I use "quickly enough for" in a sentence?

Use "quickly enough for" to show that something is fast enough to meet a specific need or expectation. For example, "The delivery was "quickly enough for" us to start the project on time".

What can I say instead of "quickly enough for"?

You can use alternatives like "sufficiently fast for", "rapidly enough for", or "fast enough to" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "quickly enough for"?

Yes, "quickly enough for" is grammatically correct. It functions as an adverbial phrase indicating that an action is performed at a speed sufficient for a particular purpose.

What's the difference between ""quickly enough for"" and "fast enough to"?

While both phrases express the idea of sufficient speed, ""quickly enough for"" often implies a more general assessment of speed relative to a need. "Fast enough to" tends to emphasize the ability to perform a specific action.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: