quick enough for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "quick enough for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe whether something meets a required speed or efficiency for a particular purpose or situation. Example: "The new software is quick enough for our needs, allowing us to process data in real-time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

"And not quick enough for international football".

The Guardian - Sport

He's not responsive quick enough for me.

The New Yorker

It was not quick enough for Howard and United.

The New York Times - Sports

"For me the appeal can't come quick enough for Ched.

The Guardian - Sport

(Five minutes wasn't quick enough for me, but I'm not part of the free-software world).

The New York Times - Arts

They didn't go quite quick enough for him and he pulled a bit".

The Guardian - Sport

I'm very confident, totally prepared and Saturday could not come quick enough for me".

The Guardian - Sport

Commission members said that would not be quick enough for people to deal with investment accounts.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

Financial conflict of interest was keeping online seller TicketMaster out of the resale market, he concluded, while eBay's bidding model wasn't nimble enough for quick sales of event tickets.

Stanford University

You want it fast enough for you have quick reactions toward people.

WikiHow

Instead a very gradual increase and decrease of motor speed is used but was quick enough to compensate for altitude changes once a high enough altitude was reached.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "quick enough for", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject needs to be quick for. For example, instead of saying "The internet is quick enough", specify "The internet is "quick enough for" streaming HD video".

Common error

Avoid using "quick enough for" without specifying the context or purpose. Saying something is "quick enough" without clarifying what it needs to be quick for leaves the statement vague and less informative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quick enough for" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase modifying a noun or pronoun. It specifies that something possesses a sufficient degree of speed or efficiency to meet a particular need or requirement. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this is a grammatically sound expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "quick enough for" is a versatile and commonly used expression for indicating whether something meets a specific speed or efficiency requirement. Ludwig AI confirms it's grammatically correct, and its widespread use across various domains, including news, science, and academia, confirms its adaptability. Remember to specify the context to avoid vagueness, as demonstrated in the usage guidance. Consider alternatives like "sufficiently fast for" or "adequately speedy for" to add variety to your writing. Overall, "quick enough for" is a valuable phrase to have in your linguistic toolkit.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently fast for

Replaces "quick" with "sufficiently fast", emphasizing the adequacy of speed.

adequately speedy for

Substitutes "quick" with "adequately speedy", highlighting the satisfactory level of speed.

fast enough to

Replaces the preposition "for" with the infinitive "to", changing the grammatical structure slightly.

sufficient to meet the needs of

Offers a more formal and detailed way of expressing adequacy for a particular requirement.

capable of handling

Shifts the focus from speed to the ability to manage or process something effectively.

up to the task of

Emphasizes preparedness and competence for a specific job or challenge.

good enough for

Simplifies the expression to a basic level of acceptability or suitability.

suitable for

Focuses on appropriateness rather than speed, though suitability often implies adequate performance.

meets the requirements of

Emphasizes compliance with specific standards or needs.

can manage

Highlights the capability to deal with something effectively, often implying sufficient speed or efficiency.

FAQs

How can I use "quick enough for" in a sentence?

You can use "quick enough for" to describe whether something meets a required speed or efficiency for a particular purpose. For example, "Is the new processor "quick enough for" video editing?"

What are some alternatives to "quick enough for"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently fast for", "adequately speedy for", or "fast enough to", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "quick enough for" or "fast enough for"?

Both "quick enough for" and "fast enough for" are correct and can be used interchangeably in many situations. The choice often depends on stylistic preference.

What does it mean when something is "not quick enough for" a specific purpose?

It means that the speed or efficiency of something does not meet the requirements for that specific purpose. For example, "The internet connection is "not quick enough for" online gaming".