quality of trial

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "quality of trial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the standards or effectiveness of a trial, such as in research or legal contexts. Example: "The quality of trial conducted by the researchers was crucial in determining the validity of the results."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Human rights groups have also been sharply critical about the quality of trial justice in Pakistan, and have raised concerns about the high number of teenagers on death row.

The New York Times

Kay Dickersin, director of Johns Hopkins University's Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence Synthesis in Baltimore, Maryland, likes the idea behind Vivli, and hopes that it will help improve the quality of trial reporting.

Science Magazine

To assess the quality of trial conduct by surgeons on a national level and the feasibility of improvement through education, this study examined the findings of the Quality Assurance Audit Program of the ACOSOG over time.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

However, results of clinical studies are difficult to compare because of variations in severity of RIF, method of RIF assessment, availability of efficient therapeutic drugs, treatment duration, and quality of trial design.

Seminars in Radiation Oncology

The following aspects of the quality of trial methodology were evaluated: generation of the allocation sequence, adequacy of concealment of the allocation of treatment, degree of blinding, and completeness of follow-up.

Plosone

Quality of trial reporting was assessed.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

This suggests poor reporting quality of trials in blood conservation.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Sponsors must take responsibility for the quality of trials at the best possible cost.

Thérapie

To establish the reporting quality of trials published in leading nursing journals and investigate associations between CONSORT Statement or trial registration endorsment and reporting of design elements.

International Journal of Nursing Studies

The aim of this systematic review is to summarise and rate the quality of trials assessing chemotherapy for treatment of ACC, by use of the European Lung Cancer Working Party scoring system.

The Lancet Oncology

The quality of trials from these countries may affect not just their substantial populations but also their contribution to health policy throughout the world.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research, clearly define what aspects of "quality of trial" you are evaluating (e.g., methodology, reporting, data integrity) to provide a specific and focused analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "quality of trial" as a vague, catch-all term. Instead, specify the elements influencing the quality, such as blinding procedures, randomization, or statistical analysis, to provide a more meaningful critique.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "quality of trial" functions primarily as a noun phrase, serving to identify and describe a specific attribute or characteristic of a trial. As shown by Ludwig, it often acts as a subject or object in sentences concerning research methodology and assessment.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

88%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "quality of trial" is a noun phrase used to assess the methodological strength and validity of research studies. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used, particularly in scientific and news contexts. Key to using the phrase effectively is specifying which aspects of quality are being assessed to avoid vagueness. Alternatives include "trial quality" or "standard of trial". By understanding its usage and common pitfalls, writers can ensure clarity and precision in their analysis of research.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

trial quality

Reverses the order, putting emphasis on 'trial' as the main subject.

standard of trial

Replaces "quality" with "standard", focusing on the level of acceptance or expectation.

trial integrity

Substitutes "quality" with "integrity", highlighting the honesty and completeness of the trial.

reliability of trial

Replaces "quality" with "reliability", underscoring the consistency and dependability of the trial results.

validity of trial

Focuses on whether the trial accurately measures what it's intended to measure.

trial soundness

Replaces "quality" with "soundness", indicating the robustness and logical coherence of the trial.

accuracy of trial

Highlights how precise and error-free the trial is.

methodological rigor of trial

Emphasizes the strictness and precision of the methods used in the trial.

evaluation of trial quality

Shifts the focus to the process of assessing the trial's quality rather than the quality itself.

robustness of trial design

Addresses the resilience and strength of the trial's structure and planning.

FAQs

How is the phrase "quality of trial" used in scientific research?

In scientific research, the phrase "quality of trial" typically refers to the methodological rigor, validity, and reliability of a study. It encompasses aspects such as proper randomization, blinding, data collection, and statistical analysis to ensure trustworthy results.

What are some alternatives to "quality of trial" that emphasize validity?

Alternatives that emphasize validity include "trial validity", "reliability of trial", or "integrity of trial". These terms highlight the accuracy and consistency of the trial's findings.

How does "quality of trial" impact the trustworthiness of research outcomes?

The "quality of trial" directly impacts the trustworthiness of research outcomes. High-quality trials with robust methodologies provide more reliable evidence, while low-quality trials may produce biased or inconsistent results, affecting the validity of conclusions.

What factors contribute to a high "quality of trial"?

Factors contributing to a high "quality of trial" include proper randomization, blinding, clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, appropriate sample size, rigorous data collection methods, and transparent reporting. These elements minimize bias and enhance the credibility of the trial's results.