Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

qualified with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"qualified with" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
It is used when something is supplemented or strengthened by something else. For example, "Her qualifications as a teacher were qualified with years of experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Intergrades of these reference groups can be qualified with principal qualifiers, while morphologic and lithologic characteristics can be presented with supplementary qualifiers.

Science

Geoderma

The final starts at 11.30am - Skelhon will face top qualifier Abdulla Sultan Alaryani of the UAE, who qualified with 592.

The United States qualified with a Pan Am win.

News & Media

The New York Times

Germany qualified with three matches to spare.

England has qualified with 24 points from their eight games.

They treat me like dirt, but we qualified with honor.

The threat to default was qualified with ifs and buts.

News & Media

The Economist

Was the nominee truly qualified, with a professional background worthy of the job?

News & Media

The New York Times

Du Toit qualified with a fourth-place finish at the open-water world championships in May.

(Spain qualified with the last kick of their playoff against Scotland).

His judgments are qualified with idiomatic self-deprecation – "maybe that's paranoia!", "Silly, isn't it".

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "qualified with", ensure that the added element genuinely enhances or specifies the subject's qualities or abilities. For instance, "The candidate was qualified with extensive research experience" clearly highlights a relevant and valuable attribute.

Common error

Avoid using "qualified with" to add irrelevant or trivial details that do not significantly enhance the subject's standing. For example, avoid statements like "The athlete qualified with a new pair of shoes", as it doesn't highlight a meaningful skill or attribute.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "qualified with" functions primarily as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating that a subject possesses certain attributes or meets specific criteria that enhance its suitability or character. As Ludwig AI explains, it indicates supplementation or reinforcement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "qualified with" is a versatile and grammatically correct expression used to indicate that a subject has been enhanced or specified with certain attributes or criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and utility in written English. It is most commonly found in news and media, as well as scientific contexts, demonstrating its applicability across different communication styles. When using this phrase, ensure that the added element genuinely enhances the subject’s qualities and avoid trivial details. By understanding its nuances and appropriate usage, you can effectively convey added value or enhanced capabilities in your writing.

More alternative expressions(10)

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

equipped with

Emphasizes the possession of necessary equipment or resources. It shifts the focus from meeting criteria to having specific tools or features.

characterized by

Highlights the defining attributes or features of something. It shifts the focus to inherent qualities rather than acquired qualifications.

supplemented by

Focuses on the addition of something to enhance or complete. The emphasis changes to augmentation rather than inherent qualities.

accompanied by

Implies that something is present together with something else, often suggesting a simultaneous occurrence or presence.

possessing

Highlights the ownership or presence of a particular attribute. Differs in that it directly states ownership rather than qualification.

furnished with

Implies providing something with necessary items. Slightly different focus compared to inherent attributes or criteria.

enhanced by

Suggests that something has been improved or made better by the addition of something else. It shifts from meeting criteria to improving the overall quality.

completed by

Indicates that something is made whole or finished by something else. Differs as it focuses on completeness rather than the nature of the qualities.

distinguished by

Highlights the unique features that set something apart. Focus shifts from qualities to unique identifiers.

defined by

Emphasizes the essential qualities or characteristics that determine the nature of something. It shifts the focus from qualification to foundational definition.

FAQs

How to use "qualified with" in a sentence?

Use "qualified with" to indicate that a subject possesses certain attributes or meets specific criteria, such as "The software is "qualified with" the latest security patches".

What can I say instead of "qualified with"?

You can use alternatives like "equipped with", "characterized by", or "supplemented by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "qualified with" or "qualify with"?

"Qualified with" is used in the past tense to describe something that has already met certain criteria or been enhanced, whereas "qualify with" is an infinitive verb form, used to describe the action of meeting criteria or enhancing in general.

What's the difference between "qualified with" and "well qualified"?

"Qualified with" describes how something or someone has gained additional attributes or met specific criteria, whereas "well qualified" describes the state of being highly suitable or capable for a particular role or task.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: