provinces of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "provinces of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to specific regions or administrative divisions within a country or territory. Example: "The provinces of Canada each have their own unique culture and governance."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

They envisage establishing committees in the 17 provinces of Iraq.

The New York Times

Other casualties occurred in the provinces of Mardin and Diyarbakır.

The Guardian

Separatist groups rattle the border provinces of Baluchistan and Kurdistan.

The Economist

Saddam Hussein starved the provinces of power to feed Baghdad.

The Economist

I named the ancestral provinces of my grandfathers.

The New York Times - Magazine

Sharply distinguished from Italy were the provinces of the empire.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Alberta, the problem is most severe.

The New York Times - Science

The insurgency has also become increasingly tenacious in the neighboring provinces of Herat and Faryab.

The New York Times

Similar lawsuits have been filed in the provinces of British Columbia, Manitoba, Alberta and Saskatchewan.

The Guardian

Excavations continue apace in the Argentine provinces of Córdoba, Tucuman and Mendoza.

The Guardian - Opinion

Growing up in the provinces of northern Spain, he wanted to be an airline pilot.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "provinces of", ensure that the context clearly indicates a formal administrative division within a country or empire. For instance, it is appropriate to say "the provinces of Canada" or "the provinces of ancient Rome".

Common error

Avoid using "provinces of" when referring to informal or colloquial regions. It is more appropriate to use general terms like "regions", "areas", or "parts" instead of "provinces of" when describing informal areas within a country.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "provinces of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, specifying administrative or geographical divisions within a larger entity. As supported by Ludwig, this phrase is commonly used in various contexts to denote specific regions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

18%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "provinces of" is a common and grammatically correct way to refer to administrative or geographical divisions within a larger entity. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across varied contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedic content. While "regions of", "territories of", and "states within" can be alternatives, the choice depends on the specific nuance required. It's essential to use "provinces of" when referring to formal administrative divisions, avoiding it for informal regions. Ludwig's analysis shows its frequency and reliability in authoritative sources such as The New York Times and The Guardian, making it a valuable phrase for precise and clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regions of

This alternative broadens the scope from strictly administrative divisions to include broader geographical areas.

territories of

This alternative emphasizes the aspect of land ownership and governance by a central authority.

states within

This term is specifically used when referring to regions that have a degree of autonomy within a federal system.

districts of

This refers to smaller, often urban-focused administrative areas.

counties of

This term denotes administrative divisions, typically in the context of the United States or the United Kingdom.

areas in

This alternative is less formal and refers to a specific portion of a place.

zones of

This indicates areas designated for a specific purpose or characteristic.

parts of

This is a more general term that can refer to any section or component of a larger area.

sectors within

This specifies an area typically designated for a specific activity.

divisions of

This alternative emphasizes an organization or separation of the main region in smaller portions.

FAQs

How to use "provinces of" in a sentence?

You can use "provinces of" to refer to administrative divisions within a country. For example: "The northern "provinces of" Argentina have been slow to implement the law in full."

What can I say instead of "provinces of"?

Alternatives include "regions of", "territories of", or "states within" depending on the specific context and the nature of the administrative divisions you are referring to.

Which is correct, "provinces of" or "region of"?

"Provinces of" refers specifically to administrative divisions within a country or empire, while "region of" is a more general term for any geographical area. The choice depends on the context and specificity required.

What's the difference between "provinces of" and "states of"?

"Provinces of" typically refers to administrative divisions in countries like Canada or Argentina, whereas "states of" is commonly used in federal systems like the United States or India, where the divisions have a degree of autonomy.