Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
provided input for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "provided input for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a situation where someone has contributed information, ideas, or feedback to a project or discussion. Example: "During the meeting, she provided input for the new marketing strategy, which helped shape our approach."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
32 human-written examples
Particle tracking solved the transport equations for conservative compounds and provided input for PHREEQC-2.
Binary collision approximation calculations provided input for the recoil energies due to MeV ions.
AZ led the project, contributed with critical reading of the manuscript, and provided input for the final version.
LM collected and analyzed the samples, contributed to the critical reading of the manuscript, and provided input for the final version.
Dr. Martin Lawless provided input for all statistical analysis and Dr. Seamus Kelly provided detailed input on sport and exercise management.
Science
Findings of the SLR provided input for the topic list that guided the semi-structured interviews and were also used as probes for follow-up questions.
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
28 human-written examples
SN participated in field organization and and provided inputs for manuscripts.
Science
RG, SC and SB compiled and analyzed all data and provided inputs for interpretation of results.
Science
RA contributed to the experimental design and provided inputs for interpretation of results.
Science
PZ, MV, CL, MJ, LS, JC, MR and JMB provided inputs for the draft.
Science
SM conceived and co-designed the study, provided inputs for writing and supervised the study.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Vary your language to prevent redundancy. Alternatives like "contributed to", "assisted with", or "offered insights for" can add nuance and avoid repetition.
Common error
Avoid using the passive voice unnecessarily. Instead of "input was provided for", use the active voice: "[Name] provided input for". This makes the sentence more direct and engaging.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "provided input for" functions as a verb phrase indicating that someone has contributed information, ideas, or feedback to a specific project, document, or discussion. Ludwig provides several examples showing how this phrase is used in diverse academic and professional contexts.
Frequent in
Science
78%
News & Media
16%
Formal & Business
6%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "provided input for" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to describe contributions to various projects and discussions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely accepted and understood. With a common usage frequency, it's particularly prevalent in scientific and professional contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure you specify the type of input given and consider active voice constructions for clarity. While alternatives like "contributed to" or "assisted with" exist, "provided input for" remains a solid and widely recognized choice for acknowledging someone's influence.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
offered insights for
Focuses on offering deep understanding or perspectives.
contributed feedback to
Highlights the act of giving constructive criticism or suggestions.
assisted with the design of
Emphasizes help in the creation or planning phase.
aided in the development of
Stresses the support given during the growth or evolution of something.
gave recommendations for
Highlights the act of suggesting improvements or courses of action.
shared expertise in
Focuses on providing specialized knowledge or skills.
advised on the strategy for
Highlights providing guidance on a plan of action.
participated in shaping
Emphasizes active involvement in influencing the form or nature of something.
collaborated on
Highlights working jointly with others.
consulted on
Emphasizes the act of seeking expert advice.
FAQs
How can I use "provided input for" in a sentence?
You can use "provided input for" to describe someone's contribution to a project, discussion, or decision-making process. For example: "The team members "provided input for" the new marketing strategy." It indicates that they offered information, ideas, or feedback.
What are some alternatives to "provided input for"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "offered insights for", "contributed feedback to", or "assisted with the design of".
Is it better to say "provided input on" or "provided input for"?
While both are grammatically acceptable, "provided input for" is generally preferred when the input is used to influence or shape something. "Provided input on" is more suitable when discussing a topic or subject in general.
What does it mean when someone has "provided input for" a document?
It generally means that the person has read and reviewed the document and has offered suggestions, corrections, or additional information that were considered in the final version. This is often seen when someone "contributed feedback to" the draft.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.3/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested