Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

proved to be efficient

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"proved to be efficient" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use it when referring to something that has been tested or evaluated and found to be effective. For example, "The new project management system proved to be efficient, allowing us to complete tasks in half the time".

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Both approaches proved to be efficient and robust.

Both dimeric constructs proved to be efficient immunogens.

The system proved to be efficient and stable during a 2-month trial.

Finally, this system also proved to be efficient for the synthesis of dimpled polymer particles.

Science

Polymer

The main drilling and completion techniques established in this study proved to be efficient.

The methodology used proved to be efficient for the selection of potentially active compounds.

This method is proved to be efficient in screening specific markers in microsatellite libraries.

In particular, treatment with hydrofluoric acid proved to be efficient to achieve acceptable anchoring effect.

The application was tested on a case study and proved to be efficient.

The 2-D SWT is performed to real Bscan data and proved to be efficient.

Simulation models have been proved to be efficient methods for this purpose.

Science

Pedosphere
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "proved to be efficient", ensure that the context clearly indicates the criteria used to assess efficiency. Specify what makes it efficient (e.g., time, cost, resources).

Common error

Avoid using "proved to be efficient" as a generic statement without providing supporting evidence or context. Always provide specific details on how the efficiency was measured or observed.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "proved to be efficient" typically functions as a descriptive phrase within a sentence, often modifying a noun or noun phrase. It indicates that something has demonstrated its ability to achieve a desired outcome with minimal waste of resources. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

97%

Academia

2%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "proved to be efficient" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, primarily in scientific and academic contexts, to describe something that has demonstrated its effectiveness. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in formal English. When using this phrase, provide clear context and specific details to support the claim of efficiency. Alternative phrases include "was effective", "demonstrated efficiency", and "turned out to be efficient". Remember to avoid overuse without justification and always substantiate claims of efficiency with concrete evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "proved to be efficient" in a sentence?

You can use "proved to be efficient" to describe a method, system, or tool that has demonstrated its ability to achieve results effectively. For example, "The new algorithm "proved to be efficient" in reducing processing time".

What are some alternatives to saying "proved to be efficient"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "was effective", "demonstrated efficiency", or "turned out to be efficient".

Is it better to say "proved to be efficient" or "was found to be efficient"?

Both "proved to be efficient" and "was found to be efficient" are correct. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the process of proving or the discovery of efficiency. The phrase "was found to be efficient" suggests an element of surprise or unexpected discovery.

What is the difference between "proved to be efficient" and "proved its efficiency"?

"Proved to be efficient" describes a quality or characteristic, while "proved its efficiency" emphasizes the action of demonstrating efficiency. For example, "The system "proved to be efficient" in handling large datasets," versus "The system proved its efficiency through rigorous testing."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: