prove onerous for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prove onerous for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a task or responsibility that is burdensome or difficult for someone to handle. Example: "The new regulations may prove onerous for small businesses trying to comply with the extensive requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Higher rates may prove onerous for embattled consumers, however.

The Economist

Such requirements should not prove onerous for developing countries.

The Economist

Analyst Gary Greenwood said: Despite this news, we continue to believe that any good bank/bad bank split will not prove onerous for minority shareholders.

The Guardian - Business

Tonight, at the conference meeting, Mr. Gramm added that he feared that the bill "will do more harm than it should," citing what he said were provisions that would encourage "predatory" lawsuits and other language that he said would prove onerous for thousands of smaller publicly traded corporations.

The New York Times

If credit doesn't tighten further and President-elect Obama's tax plan, whatever form it takes, doesn't prove onerous for most small companies (admittedly, two large assumptions), 2009 could be a ripe opportunity for new and capable business owners.

Forbes

You can see a lot of potential in those mechanics, used not just for customer service inquiries but for sales and other marketing (which could prove onerous for users, but we'll have to see).

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Without a robust operation, even obligatory tasks like collecting signatures to qualify for the Democratic ballot may prove onerous.

The New York Times

"A chase of 211 should not prove onerous but the odd ball is lifting sharply off the back of a length.

BBC

But his days were spent driving a school bus, and the additional time he spent commuting between house and temple for twice-daily services proved onerous.

The New York Times

The second task of the new government, to secure the loyalty of its approximately 15 million citizens, proved onerous as well.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Even day to day, though, the rules are proving onerous: at campuses throughout the country, students have had to delay their studies because they're unable to schedule consular interviews; students who'd left the United States for vacation or family emergencies have been denied re-entry; and invited speakers have been unable to obtain visas in time to give scheduled talks.

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prove onerous for", ensure the subject is clearly defined and the context makes it evident why the subject would find something burdensome. For example, "The new regulations may prove onerous for small businesses."

Common error

Avoid using "prove onerous for" when simpler terms like "difficult" or "challenging" would suffice. Overusing formal language can make your writing sound pretentious. For example, instead of saying "The task proved onerous for him", consider "The task was difficult for him."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prove onerous for" functions as a verb phrase indicating that something will likely create a significant burden or difficulty for someone or something. Ludwig AI provides examples that illustrate how new regulations or complex tasks can "prove onerous for" various entities.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "prove onerous for" is a grammatically correct and usable expression indicating that something is likely to be burdensome or difficult. Ludwig AI identifies its usage as uncommon and spanning across News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business contexts. The phrase carries a neutral to formal tone, suggesting its suitability for professional and journalistic writing. To avoid misinterpretations, it is recommended to be clear on what could be burdensome to whom and to adjust the formality based on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

become burdensome for

Replaces "prove" with "become" and "onerous" with "burdensome", focusing on the state of becoming a burden.

turn out to be taxing for

Uses "taxing" to replace "onerous", emphasizing the demanding nature of something.

present challenges for

Shifts the focus to the challenges posed, rather than the burden experienced.

create difficulties for

Highlights the creation of difficulties instead of describing the degree of difficulty.

pose a hardship for

Replaces "onerous" with "hardship", suggesting a difficult or painful situation.

place a strain on

Focuses on the stress or pressure exerted on something or someone.

be a struggle for

Highlights the effort and difficulty involved.

become a weight on

Emphasizes the burden and oppressive feeling.

cause complications for

Draws attention to the resultant problems or issues.

prove problematic for

Emphasizes that something has problems for someone or something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "prove onerous for" to sound more formal?

To sound more formal, you could use alternatives like "become burdensome for", "turn out to be taxing for", or "pose a hardship for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What's a less formal alternative to "prove onerous for"?

For a less formal tone, consider using phrases such as "be a struggle for", "prove difficult for", or "cause problems for".

In what context is it appropriate to use the phrase "prove onerous for"?

The phrase "prove onerous for" is appropriate when describing tasks, responsibilities, or situations that are not only difficult but also create a significant burden or hardship. It suggests that something is demanding and requires considerable effort or resources. For example, "The new regulations might "prove onerous for" small businesses struggling to comply."

What are some common grammatical errors to avoid when using "prove onerous for"?

A common error is using "prove onerous for" without a clear subject. Ensure it's evident who or what finds something burdensome. Also, avoid using it in situations where simpler, more direct language would suffice. Additionally, be mindful of subject-verb agreement. For instance, "The new policy may "prove onerous for" everyone involved."