protected to be

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "protected to be" is not correct and usable in written English.
It seems to be an incorrect construction and does not convey a clear meaning in standard English usage. Example: "The data is protected to be secure." (This is incorrect; a better phrasing would be needed.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

For example, it could be possible that patients with a positive blood culture are treated longer and therefore are more protected to be discharged too early.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

We all deserve to have equal rights, to feel safe & protected, to be free from others telling us what we can or can't do with our love or our bodies.

Huffington Post

To God and the angels we are all equal; we all deserve to be protected, to be cared for, and to be loved, regardless of what others might think of us--good or bad.

Huffington Post

During the Second World War, Barnes Wallis developed for the Royal Air Force two large "earthquake" bombs, the five-ton Tallboy and the ten-ton Grand Slam, for use against targets too heavily protected to be affected by conventional high explosive bombs.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

And there is much protecting to be done.

The Guardian

Your privacy is protected, to an extent.

WikiHow

The security services, which are protecting British people, have to be protected themselves too, he says.

The Guardian

Clearly, the guys in charge of protecting the president need to be protected from themselves.

Vice

This failure to protect is getting to be a bad habit.

Huffington Post

If corridors need to be protected, how should they be protected and under whose authority?

Pastoralism

These need to be protected.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity, avoid the phrase "protected to be". Instead, opt for more common and grammatically sound alternatives such as "needs to be protected" or "should be protected".

Common error

Avoid using "protected to be" in an attempt to sound formal or sophisticated. This construction often results in awkward phrasing. Strive for simplicity and directness in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "protected to be" functions as part of a passive verb construction, indicating a state where something requires safeguarding. However, Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct and is rarely used in standard English, leading to awkward phrasing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

25%

Science

50%

Wiki

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "protected to be" is grammatically incorrect and not recommended for use in standard English writing. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, noting that it is an uncommon and awkward construction. While the intent is to convey the need for safeguarding, clearer and more accepted alternatives like "needs to be protected" or "should be protected" are preferable. These alternatives ensure better clarity and grammatical correctness, maintaining a professional and understandable tone across various contexts. Considering its infrequency and grammatical issues, it's best to avoid this phrase in favor of more standard options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

needs protection

Focuses on the requirement of protection rather than the state of being protected.

requires safeguarding

Highlights the necessity of safeguarding, emphasizing active measures.

must be defended

Emphasizes active defense, implying a threat or challenge.

should be shielded

Suggests a covering or barrier against harm.

ought to be preserved

Focuses on maintaining the current state through protective measures.

warrants protection

Indicates that something deserves or merits being protected.

is in need of security

Directly states the requirement for security measures.

demands protection

Highlights the urgency and necessity of protective actions.

is vulnerable and requires protection

Highlights both vulnerability and the subsequent need for protective actions.

necessitates protective measures

Emphasizes the need for specific actions to ensure protection.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "protected to be"?

Instead of "protected to be", consider using phrases like "needs to be protected", "should be protected", or "must be protected" for improved clarity and grammatical correctness.

Is "protected to be" grammatically correct?

The phrase "protected to be" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use more common and accepted alternatives.

How can I use the idea of something needing protection in a sentence without using "protected to be"?

You can rephrase sentences using constructions like "The environment needs to be protected", or "Children should be protected from harm".

What is the difference between "protected to be" and "needs to be protected"?

"Protected to be" is an uncommon and grammatically awkward construction. "Needs to be protected" is a clearer and more widely accepted way to express that something requires protection.