needs to be protected

USAGE SUMMARY

'needs to be protected' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something that requires protection. For example: "The environment needs to be protected from pollution."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

And it needs to be protected".

The New York Times

That safeguard needs to be protected.

The Economist

It needs to be protected.

The Guardian

Victoria still needs to be protected".

The Guardian

Customers' information needs to be protected.

Harvard Business Review

Americans' $700 billion investment needs to be protected.

The New York Times

He's a young lad who needs to be protected.

The Guardian - Sport

The "best idea" needs to be protected and celebrated.

The New York Times

"Rome needs to be protected, its beauty respected".

The New York Times

Certainly, Lynch's privacy about her ordeal needs to be protected.

The Washington Post

"There is now a sense that groundwater is finite and needs to be protected".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "needs to be protected", clearly state what is being protected and from what threat. This adds clarity and emphasizes the importance of the protection.

Common error

Avoid using "needs to be protected" without specifying the object and the threat. For example, instead of saying "It needs to be protected", specify "The historical site needs to be protected from vandalism".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "needs to be protected" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject requires safeguarding from potential harm or threats. Ludwig AI confirms this is a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "needs to be protected" is a versatile and commonly used expression for indicating the necessity of safeguarding something from potential harm or threats. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for a wide range of contexts. It sees frequent usage in "News & Media", science, and formal business settings, as the Ludwig examples show. When using this phrase, it's crucial to specify what requires protection and from what, to ensure clarity and impact. Alternatives like "requires safeguarding" or "must be defended" can be used to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

requires safeguarding

Emphasizes the active requirement of protecting something.

must be defended

Focuses on defending against potential threats or attacks.

should be preserved

Highlights the importance of maintaining something in its original condition.

warrants preservation

Highlights the justification for keeping something safe and unchanged.

demands protection

Stresses the urgency and necessity of protecting something.

calls for security

Emphasizes the need for measures that ensure safety.

is deserving of defense

Focuses on highlighting the value and importance of something and then its deserving for protection.

is in need of preservation

Directly states the necessity of preserving something.

protection is vital for

Rephrases to highlight that protection is essential for something.

security is essential to

Shifts the focus to the importance of security for something's well-being.

FAQs

How can I use "needs to be protected" in a sentence?

Use "needs to be protected" to express that something requires safeguarding from harm, damage, or threats. For example, "The environment "needs to be protected" from pollution".

What are some alternatives to saying "needs to be protected"?

Alternatives include phrases like "requires safeguarding", "must be defended", or "should be preserved", depending on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "needs protected" instead of "needs to be protected"?

While "needs protected" might be encountered in informal speech, the grammatically correct and more widely accepted form is ""needs to be protected"". The latter ensures clarity and aligns with standard English grammar.

What's the difference between "needs to be protected" and "must be protected"?

"Needs to be protected" implies a requirement for protection, while "must be protected" conveys a stronger sense of obligation or necessity. "Must be protected" often suggests a higher level of urgency or importance.