proposal was met

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "proposal was met" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that a proposal has been received or responded to, often in the context of discussions or negotiations. Example: "The proposal was met with enthusiasm from the committee, leading to a swift approval process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

Mr Edge proposed a review journal to the Council and his proposal was met with positive enthusiasm.

Animal Health Research Reviews

This proposal was met with resounding cheers.

The Guardian

The proposal was met with guarded support by county officials.

The New York Times

As Kiefer recalled it, his cooling-tower proposal was met with accusations of grandiosity.

The New Yorker

But the proposal was met with stiff resistance by politicians from chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives.

The Guardian

This proposal was met with outrage by the members of the international development committee.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

17 human-written examples

The subject was the Homeland Security bill that the administration was pressing for; the sweeping proposal was meeting resistance from Democrats on the Hill.

The New York Times - Magazine

Stringer's proposal is met with a curt refusal from Marlo Stanfield, leader of a new, growing crew.

Wikipedia

The American proposal is meeting resistance in the council, said Ambassador Nancy Soderberg, who represented the United States in the discussions today.

The New York Times

In 2009, when Democrats controlled the House, Republican attempts to mock President Obama's health care proposals were met with similar edits.

The New York Times

Their proposals were met with fierce opposition from Camden's planners, who had earmarked the site for affordable housing (a plan that was overturned by central government pressure).

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "proposal was met", ensure that the subject clearly identifies who or what the proposal was presented to (e.g., "The proposal was met with enthusiasm by the board.").

Common error

Avoid using "proposal was met" without specifying the entity that did the meeting. Vague subjects make the sentence weak and unclear. For example, instead of saying "The proposal was met with interest", specify who showed the interest.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "proposal was met" functions as a passive construction, indicating how a proposal was received. It's used to describe the reaction or response to a suggested plan or idea. Ludwig examples show varied reactions, from enthusiasm to opposition.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "proposal was met" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to describe the reception of a proposal. As Ludwig AI confirms, its aiResponseStatus indicates a valid and usable expression. The phrase is frequently found in news and media, wiki, and science contexts, indicating its versatility. While generally neutral in register, specifying the subject and the nature of the response enhances clarity. Consider alternatives like "the idea was received" or "the suggestion encountered" for nuanced expression. The authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian and various Ludwig examples attest to its widespread use and acceptability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the idea was received

Replaces "proposal" with "idea" for a less formal context.

the suggestion encountered

Focuses on the reception of a suggestion, rather than a formal proposal.

the recommendation faced

Substitutes "recommendation" for "proposal", suggesting a formal suggestion.

the proposition elicited

Employs "proposition" for a more formal tone and "elicited" to highlight the response.

the plan garnered

Uses "plan" instead of "proposal" and "garnered" to imply a specific type of response.

the submission prompted

Highlights that the submission created or caused reaction.

the offer drew

Replaces "proposal" with "offer", indicating a specific type of suggestion.

response to the initiative

Expresses how an initiative received the reaction.

the scheme generated

Uses 'scheme' instead of 'proposal' and generated to highlight how it was triggered.

the motion prompted

Replaces "proposal" with "motion", often related to political or formal debate.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "proposal was met" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you could say "the proposal elicited", "the proposal garnered", or "the proposal was received favorably/unfavorably" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "proposal was met with enthusiasm" and "proposal was met with resistance"?

The main difference lies in the reaction to the proposal. "Proposal was met with enthusiasm" indicates a positive reception, while "proposal was met with resistance" suggests opposition or disapproval.

Is it correct to say "proposal is met" instead of "proposal was met"?

No, "proposal is met" is not typically correct. "Proposal was met" is in the past tense, indicating a completed action. "Proposal is met" would only be appropriate in very specific, unusual contexts.

What are some synonyms for "met with" in the context of "proposal was met"?

Synonyms include "received", "greeted with", "faced", or "elicited". For example, "The proposal was greeted with skepticism" is an alternative to "The "proposal was met" with skepticism".