Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
proportions of intensity
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "proportions of intensity" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing varying levels or degrees of intensity in a particular subject, such as art, music, or scientific measurements. Example: "The artist skillfully balanced the proportions of intensity in the colors to create a striking visual impact."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
They represent the proportions of intensity of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated and unmethylated (U) sites (β = M/[c + M + U] with constant c introduced for the situation of too small M + U).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
The proportion of intensity that can be attributed to 'Bragg' reduces to 65% compared with 70% for the 10 µm crystallites.
The intensity is assumed to only come from Bragg scattering in the former, whereas this new theory reduces the proportion of intensity from Bragg scattering to ∼0.75 for 10 µm Si crystallites.
In the IOW birth cohort, after cleaning the DNA-M data, beta values are presented as the proportion of intensity of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) sites (β = M/[c + M + U] with c being a constant to prevent dividing by zero) were used to estimate the effect of DNA methylation [ 32].
Science
The pre-processed DNA-M beta values, presented as the proportion of intensity of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) sites (β = M/[c + M + U] with c being a constant to prevent dividing by zero), were used to estimate the effect of DNA-M [ 20].
Science
After cleaning the DNA-M data, beta values presented as the proportion of intensity of methylated (M) over the sum of methylated (M) and unmethylated (U) sites (β = M/[c + M + U] with c being a constant to prevent dividing by zero) were used to estimate the effect of DNA methylation [ 16].
Science
The proportion of low-intensity residential, high-intensity residential, and industrial/commercial/transportation land uses within 1 km of each location was calculated.
For PM10, distance to road, elevation, proportion of low-intensity residential, high-intensity residential, and industrial, commercial, or transportation land use within 1 km were all statistically significant predictors of measured PM10 (model R = 0.49, CV R = 0.55).
Generalized additive models were used to predict spatial surfaces from monitoring data and GIS-derived covariates (e.g. distance to road, elevation, proportion of low-intensity residential, high-intensity residential, and industrial, commercial land use).
This will also give an estimate of the proportion of the intensity associated with the Bragg condition, compared with that from non-Bragg, for a stationary sample: essentially, the intensity distribution for a specific experimental configuration.
The high total prevalence and the large proportion of high intensity infections that we found indicate that according to WHO criteria regular treatment of schoolchildren in the area is indeed necessary [ 4].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing data in scientific reports, use "proportions of intensity" to clearly indicate the relative amounts of different intensity levels within a dataset. This is particularly useful in fields like image analysis or signal processing.
Common error
Avoid assuming that "proportions of intensity" directly translate to absolute intensity values. Proportions are relative measures, and the overall scale of intensity must also be considered for a complete understanding. Ensure to specify the total intensity range alongside proportions for clarity.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "proportions of intensity" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes the relative amounts or distribution of different intensity values within a dataset. Ludwig examples showcase usage in contexts like DNA methylation and image analysis, aligning with this function.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "proportions of intensity" is a grammatically correct noun phrase commonly employed in scientific literature to describe the relative distribution of intensity levels. As Ludwig AI confirms, its primary function is to quantify and compare intensity patterns, typically in fields like image analysis and DNA methylation studies. While alternatives like "levels of intensity" or "degrees of intensity" exist, "proportions of intensity" precisely indicates relative amounts. It's crucial to avoid misinterpreting these proportions as absolute values without considering the overall intensity scale.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
amounts of intensity
Replaces "proportions" with "amounts", focusing on the quantity of intensity rather than relative distribution.
rates of intensity
Substitutes "proportions" with "rates", emphasizing the change or frequency of intensity.
percentages of intensity
Replaces "proportions" with "percentages", highlighting the relative amount of intensity in terms of hundredths.
distributions of intensity
Substitutes "proportions" with "distributions", focusing on how intensity is spread across a range.
levels of intensity
Replaces "proportions" with "levels", emphasizing specific degrees or stages of intensity.
degrees of intensity
Changes "proportions" to "degrees", indicating specific gradations of intensity.
heights of intensity
Focuses on the peak or maximum values of intensity, differing from proportional distribution.
representation of intensity
Shifts the focus to how intensity is depicted or symbolized, diverging from proportional considerations.
distribution of intensity
Highlights the arrangement of intensity without specifying proportional amounts.
extent of intensity
Emphasizes the scope or range of intensity, rather than its relative portions.
FAQs
How can I effectively use "proportions of intensity" in a scientific paper?
Use "proportions of intensity" to describe the relative distribution of different intensity values within a sample. For example, "The analysis revealed that the "proportions of intensity" were significantly different between the control and experimental groups."
What are some alternatives to "proportions of intensity"?
You can use alternatives like "levels of intensity", "degrees of intensity", or "amounts of intensity", depending on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
In what fields is the phrase "proportions of intensity" commonly used?
The phrase "proportions of intensity" is often found in scientific fields like image analysis, signal processing, and medical imaging, where quantifying and comparing relative intensity levels is crucial.
How does "proportions of intensity" differ from simply stating "intensity"?
"Intensity" refers to the absolute or overall magnitude, while ""proportions of intensity"" describes how that intensity is distributed across different components or regions. It provides a relative measure, not an absolute one.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested