Sentence examples for proportion of letters from inspiring English sources

For all core information items, the proportion of letters containing them increased at time 1 compared to baseline.

This could in part be explained by the high proportion of letters which were 'returned to sender'.

Following introduction of the RMC, the proportion of letters containing each of the core items increased compared to baseline.

In our study, only a small proportion of letters (3%%) was returned as undeliverable, consistent with results reported in other maternity surveys (1.5 6 % [ 8, 13, 15– 15]).

The application of the subjective override increased the proportion of letters meeting the criteria to 54.2% and 46.8% respectively, but there was no statistically significant change in the overall quality of referral letters as judged by the Grol quality criteria between the two time periods (Table  3).

We examined the relation between company, drug, and review process characteristics and whether a press release was issued; whether the press release matched any letter statements; the proportion of letter statements that were matched in associated press releases; and whether the press release contained at least one letter statement recommending a new clinical trial for safety or efficacy.

For example, the two sequences {A, A, A, A, B, B, B, B, C} and {A, B, C, B, B, A, A, B, A} have the same proportions of letters, however the overall complexity of the first sequence is less than the complexity of the second sequence.

In our case, some departments generated a relevant proportion of discharge letters with general purpose text processing and did not store them into the HIS, which is problematic for data security reasons and leads to incomplete electronic patient records.

A significantly higher proportion of referral letters was consistent with the regional guidelines in the intervention arm than in the comparison arm (breast cancer alone and breast and colorectal cancer combined; Table 3).

Experiment 1 involved imagining a letter inside a circle, followed by a decision concerning which of two highlighted portions of the circle would contain the greater proportion of the letter.

Within a row, different superscript letters correspond to significant differences between the groups (P < 0.05): capital letters for the proportion of seropositive pigs, lowercase letters for the IP values.