Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
previously started
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "previously started" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to something that was initiated or begun at an earlier time. Example: "We will continue with the project that was previously started last month."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
He previously started courses at both Liverpool and Leeds.
News & Media
I cannot recall having previously started a blogpost by reporting a speech to the Irish parliament.
News & Media
Mr. Hammond, 53, previously started a human resources consulting firm and an art gallery, and was a cartoonist.
News & Media
It is being investigated as a possible arson because suspicious fires have previously started in the same area, he said.
News & Media
Balihoo was founded by Peter Gombert, an entrepreneur who had previously started and sold three software companies.
News & Media
The two men previously started Opsware, a data center software company, and sold it to Hewlett-Packard in 2007.
News & Media
Burck Smith, who previously started an online tutoring company, founded Straighterline in 2008 to challenge the high cost of college.
News & Media
NPR previously started a midday newsmagazine called "Day to Day" in 2003, but it was canceled in 2009.
News & Media
I had previously started two other games in the Zelda series but found both so lackluster that I stopped playing within a couple of hours.
News & Media
Having previously started every one of the Colts' games since being drafted in 1998, he would go on to miss the entire 2011 season.
News & Media
Only two women have previously started a grand prix, the Italians Maria Teresa de Filipis and Lella Lombardi, the latter back in 1976.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "previously started", ensure the context clearly indicates what the action or process is and why its prior commencement is relevant. For example, "The project, previously started in 2024, is now nearing completion."
Common error
Avoid using "previously started" with redundant time adverbs that reiterate the past nature of the action. For instance, instead of saying "previously started before", simply use "previously started" or "started before".
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "previously started" functions as a verb phrase indicating an action that began at an earlier point in time. Ludwig's examples show it commonly modifies nouns, specifying that something had an initial phase or stage.
Frequent in
News & Media
40%
Science
30%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Wiki
10%
Reference
5%
Encyclopedias
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "previously started" is a grammatically correct and frequently used verb phrase that describes an action or process that began at some point in the past. As indicated by Ludwig, it's commonly found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When using this phrase, it's crucial to avoid redundancy by omitting unnecessary time adverbs. The related phrases offer similar meanings but may vary in formality or emphasis. Understanding the nuances of "previously started" and its alternatives can enhance the precision and clarity of your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
already begun
Emphasizes the completed aspect of starting, focusing on the state after the commencement.
formerly initiated
More formal, highlighting the official or structured beginning of something.
previously commenced
A formal alternative using a synonym for 'started', indicating a prior beginning.
earlier initiated
Highlights that the initiation occurred at an earlier, unspecified time.
already initiated
Emphasizes that something has already undergone initiation.
had started before
Explicitly states the temporal order, that the starting happened before something else.
began earlier
Simpler phrasing, emphasizing that the start was at an earlier time.
started in the past
Directly indicates that the commencement was in a prior time frame.
used to start
Highlights a past habitual action of starting something.
once initiated
Implies that the action of initiating only occurred a single time.
FAQs
How can I use "previously started" in a sentence?
You can use "previously started" to describe something that began before a specific time or event. For instance, "The research, "previously started" by another team, was continued by our lab."
What are some alternatives to "previously started"?
Alternatives include "already begun", "formerly initiated", or "previously commenced". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality.
Is it correct to say "previously started before"?
No, saying "previously started before" is redundant. It's better to use either "previously started" or "started before" to avoid repetition.
What is the difference between "previously started" and "currently ongoing"?
"Previously started" indicates that something began in the past, while "currently ongoing" means it's happening now. You might say, "The project, "previously started" in January, is "currently ongoing" and expected to finish in December."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested