previously recognized as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "previously recognized as" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been acknowledged or identified in the past, often in formal or academic contexts. Example: "The species was previously recognized as a distinct subspecies before further research reclassified it."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Charles of Durazzo, whom Joan had previously recognized as her heir, secured the aid of Pope Urban VI, who crowned him king of Naples in Rome (1381).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Carbon nanotubes exhibit faster phonon transport than diamond, which was previously recognized as the best thermal conductor, and the electric current-carrying capacity of nanotubes is approximately four orders of magnitude higher than that of copper.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This effect seems to have never been previously recognized as a possible one in chemical absorption.

Chemical Engineering Science

The variables included in the model closely correspond to those previously recognized as notably different among the two groups of farmers.

Agricultural and Food Economics

The north strand was previously recognized as an active fault, Kiyama fault, only estimated by geological analyses of borehole cores (Tsuruta and Watanabe 1978).

Earth, Planets and Space

PURPOSE: To identify and quantify the risk of developing sarcoidosis associated with specific rural exposures previously recognized as potential risk factors for this disease.

Annals of Epidemiology

Ontogenetic analyses of the main stem and the various branches of the plant demonstrate that most of the morphological and anatomical features that have been previously recognized as important inter-specific distinctions exhibit a considerable variability.

Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology

By exposing undifferentiated cells to a self-assembling matrix bearing RGDS epitopes, we elicited a regenerative signal at will that subsequently led to the identification of thrombospondin 2 (TSP2), an extracellular matrix protein that has not been previously recognized as a key player in enamel development and regeneration.

Biomaterials

In all simulated species richness scenarios, a survey directed towards those localities that were previously recognized as having a higher species richness value is not recommended if the aim is to recover the true geographical pattern of species richness in a given territory.

Biological Conservation

In it, Kemp and economist and art researcher, Dr. Giuseppe Pallanti, challenge the location previously recognized as da Vinci's birthplace and discuss new information about the identity of the woman who modeled for the Mona Lisa.

Vice

Node degree has been previously recognized as potentially influencing functional predictions.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "previously recognized as", ensure that you provide context about the current understanding or status to highlight any changes or new information.

Common error

Avoid using "previously recognized as" without providing sufficient background for your audience to understand what was formerly known. Always ensure readers can grasp the prior context, even if they are unfamiliar with the topic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "previously recognized as" functions as a passive voice construction. It highlights a state of prior acknowledgement or identification, shifting the focus from the actor (who recognized it) to the subject (what was recognized). The Ludwig AI examples confirm its usage in scientific and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

Encyclopedias

5%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "previously recognized as" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, particularly in scientific and formal contexts. It serves to provide historical context and contrast past and present understandings. While highly useful in academic and scientific writing, ensure that you provide enough context to help the readers understand what was formerly understood. Considering alternatives like "formerly identified as" or "previously known as" can add nuance to your writing. Remember to prioritize accuracy and audience awareness for impactful writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

formerly identified as

This alternative emphasizes a prior identification that may have changed.

previously known as

Focuses on prior knowledge or awareness about something.

once considered to be

Highlights a past belief or assessment that may no longer be valid.

earlier acknowledged as

Stresses a prior formal acknowledgement of something.

historically regarded as

Indicates how something was perceived over a longer period of time.

initially classified as

Refers to the original classification of something, often in a scientific context.

formerly designated as

Highlights a prior designation or official naming.

used to be known as

An informal way of referring to something's previous name or identity.

in the past recognized as

This alternative adds explicit past time frame to the recognition.

bygone era's recognition as

This alternative is a bit more poetic, marking an even earlier era.

FAQs

How can I use "previously recognized as" in a sentence?

Use "previously recognized as" to indicate a past identification or understanding of something. For example, "The species was "previously recognized as" a subspecies before further research reclassified it."

What are some alternatives to "previously recognized as"?

Alternatives include "formerly identified as", "previously known as", or "once considered to be", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "previously recognized as" in formal writing?

Yes, "previously recognized as" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic and scientific contexts, where it's important to acknowledge past understandings.

What's the difference between "previously recognized as" and "currently recognized as"?

"Previously recognized as" refers to a past understanding, while "currently recognized as" refers to the present understanding. Using both in contrast can highlight a shift in knowledge or perspective.