Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
previously diagnosed with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "previously diagnosed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a medical diagnosis that was made at an earlier time. Example: "The patient was previously diagnosed with hypertension and is currently undergoing treatment."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(19)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Two of those had also been previously diagnosed with CFS, though their school had not been told, and a further 23 were also diagnosed as having the illness.
News & Media
Osbourne, 60, was previously diagnosed with colon cancer in 2002.
News & Media
This study has identified TEN in clinical samples from Cuban patients previously diagnosed with syphilis.
In this paper, we describe the presentation of onychomadesis in a boy previously diagnosed with HFMD.
The 14.5-year-old boy, previously diagnosed with ASD, was referred with persistent bone pain.
The patient was previously diagnosed with sleep bruxism, depression and insomnia.
Interestingly, only 5 of these 23 women (22%) had been previously diagnosed with preeclampsia.
We report a boy of non-consanguineous parents, previously diagnosed with ASD at the age of 13 years.
Case 2: A 75-year-old woman was previously diagnosed with rectal cancer and had undergone surgery after chemoradiotherapy.
Science
POROS evaluates a 3-step fracture risk screening program in women 50 64 not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis.
Science
According to Cardiogram founder Brandon Ballinger's latest clinical study, the Apple Watch can detect diabetes in those previously diagnosed with the disease with an 85percentt accuracy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "previously diagnosed with", ensure the context clearly indicates the relevance of the prior diagnosis to the current situation or discussion. For example, specify how the previous diagnosis influences current treatment or prognosis.
Common error
Avoid simply stating that someone was "previously diagnosed with" a condition without providing any context or further information. Always aim to specify the condition and, if relevant, the timeframe of the diagnosis to give the reader a clearer understanding.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "previously diagnosed with" functions as a modifier, specifically a participial phrase, that provides additional information about a noun (typically a person or patient). It indicates a past medical assessment, as demonstrated in the examples provided by Ludwig.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
16%
Formal & Business
9%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "previously diagnosed with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to indicate a prior medical diagnosis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and applicable across various writing contexts, especially in science, news, and formal communications. When employing this phrase, be sure to provide sufficient context and avoid vagueness to ensure clarity and relevance. Always specify the condition and timeframe when possible. While several alternatives exist, like "formerly diagnosed with" or "earlier diagnosed with", the core meaning remains consistent. Understanding its usage and purpose can help enhance clarity and precision in both writing and speech.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
formerly diagnosed with
Replaces "previously" with "formerly", indicating a diagnosis made at an earlier time.
earlier diagnosed with
Uses "earlier" in place of "previously", emphasizing the temporal aspect of the diagnosis.
diagnosed with in the past
Emphasizes that the diagnosis occurred at some unspecified point in the past.
had a prior diagnosis of
Rephrases the sentence to focus on the patient having received a diagnosis before.
diagnosed with before
Simple substitution of "previously" with "before".
once diagnosed with
Substitutes "previously" with "once", indicating a diagnosis made at some point.
with a past diagnosis of
Reorders the sentence to highlight the presence of a historical diagnosis.
identified earlier as having
Focuses on the identification of a condition at an earlier point in time, slightly shifting the emphasis.
with a history of
More general, implying a past medical record shows the condition.
known to have had
Indicates awareness or knowledge of a prior diagnosis.
FAQs
How can I use "previously diagnosed with" in a sentence?
You can use "previously diagnosed with" to indicate that someone received a medical diagnosis at an earlier time. For instance: "The patient, "previously diagnosed with" diabetes, now presents with related complications."
What are some alternatives to saying "previously diagnosed with"?
Alternatives include "formerly diagnosed with", "earlier diagnosed with", or "had a prior diagnosis of". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
Is it appropriate to use "previously diagnosed with" in formal writing?
Yes, "previously diagnosed with" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in medical or scientific contexts. It clearly and professionally indicates a prior medical assessment. Ensure that your phrasing is accurate and supported by credible sources.
What's the difference between "previously diagnosed with" and "misdiagnosed with"?
"Previously diagnosed with" indicates a correct diagnosis made at an earlier time, while "misdiagnosed with" indicates an incorrect diagnosis that was later corrected. The key difference is the accuracy and validity of the diagnosis.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested