previously considered as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "previously considered as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to something that was regarded or classified in a certain way in the past. Example: "The theory was previously considered as the leading explanation for the phenomenon before new evidence emerged."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

H∞ was previously considered as not appropriate for this problem.

Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI

The results demonstrate that measures previously considered as suitable for mitigating shallow landslides were inappropriate from the economic viewpoint.

Engineering Geology

After these three discoveries, cells, previously considered as mere pores in plant tissue, could no longer be thought of as empty, because they contained living material.

Britannica

Never mind that this drug had never even been previously considered as a therapy for that disease: Pairing the drug and disease off produced promising therapeutic results.

Stanford University

These findings have significant implications for recovery of valuable elements from low grade and marginal ores or materials previously considered as wastes.

Minerals Engineering

Six proteins, thaumatin, monellin, mabinlin, brazzein, egg lysozyme, and neoculin (previously considered as curculin) have been identified as sweet-tasting proteins.

Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Among the other species detected was also one previously considered as regionally extinct (Nysson quadriguttatus), nine were critically endangered, 11 were endangered, and 19 were considered as vulnerable.

Biological Conservation

Moreover, we demonstrate that the flow for a case previously considered as a benchmark for the investigation of non-equilibrium chemistry can be regarded as frozen.

Journal of Computational Physics

Gene exon/intron architecture, and cDNA and protein sequences appear highly conserved through Drosophila speciation, concordantly with an essential function for MT isoforms in flies, even for those previously considered as minor products.

Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry

The lower Chattian Castro Limestone, previously considered as a fringing reef, is reinterpreted as a distally steepened ramp with a distal talus induced by a paleo-escarpment in the substrate.

Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology

Surprisingly, transmission delay has not been previously considered as performance metric [10 23, 28].

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "previously considered as" to highlight a shift in understanding or perspective. This construction is useful when contrasting a past viewpoint with a current one, adding depth and context to your writing.

Common error

Avoid excessive use of passive voice when using "previously considered as". While grammatically correct, over-reliance on the passive voice can make your writing sound less direct and engaging. Consider rephrasing to emphasize the actors or entities involved in the shift in perspective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "previously considered as" functions as a retrospective qualifier. It indicates that a subject was formerly categorized or understood in a specific way, implying a shift in perspective or understanding. Ludwig provides many examples to confirm the applicability and grammatical correctness of the statement.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

83%

Encyclopedias

5%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "previously considered as" serves as a retrospective qualifier, highlighting a shift in understanding or categorization. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness and prevalent use across various domains. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, this phrase effectively contrasts past perceptions with present knowledge, adding depth and context to discussions. While grammatically sound, it is best used with awareness of potential overuse of the passive voice. Alternatives like "formerly regarded as" or "once believed to be" can provide stylistic variation. By understanding its function and context, writers can effectively use "previously considered as" to convey nuanced perspectives in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

formerly regarded as

Emphasis on the past perspective, suitable when highlighting a change in viewpoint or understanding.

once believed to be

Highlights the prior belief, suggesting a shift in knowledge or evidence.

used to be thought of as

Implies a general consensus or common understanding that has evolved.

initially perceived as

Focuses on the first impression or early interpretation of something.

originally deemed to be

Suggests a formal assessment or judgment that has been revised.

heretofore known as

Indicates a change in name or classification, often in a legal or official context.

earlier identified as

Emphasis on a past act of identification or classification in an academic or scientific environment.

previously known under the name of

Suitable when referring to something that had a different name or designation.

formally classified as

Suitable when an item had an official categorization.

bygone understanding of

Expresses an obsolete understanding.

FAQs

How can I use "previously considered as" in a sentence?

You can use "previously considered as" to show how an idea or concept has changed over time. For example: "That approach was "previously considered as" an effective solution, but new evidence suggests otherwise."

What are some alternatives to "previously considered as"?

Alternatives include "formerly regarded as", "once believed to be", or "used to be thought of as". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "previously considered to be" instead of "previously considered as"?

Both "previously considered as" and "previously considered to be" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different connotations. "Previously considered as" emphasizes categorization or classification, while "previously considered to be" suggests a belief or perception. The choice depends on the intended meaning.

What is the difference between "previously considered as" and "now known as"?

"Previously considered as" indicates a change in understanding or classification, whereas "now known as" simply reflects a change in name or designation. For example, something "previously considered as" a waste product may be "now known as" a valuable resource after renaming it.