previous findings

USAGE SUMMARY

"previous findings" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to anything that has been discovered or determined in the past. For example, "Previous findings suggest that the climate has been changing rapidly recently."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The results largely supported previous findings.

Physiology & Behavior

These results support previous findings in human cells13,18.

Nature

The previous findings with schizophrenia are more mixed.

Nature

The present results confirm qualitatively the previous findings.

Advances in Space Research

Previous findings are contradictory.

University of Chicago

Results confirm previous findings.

Health Economics Review

These results improve previous findings.

Advances in Difference Equations

This is consistent with previous findings.

The Journal of Chinese Sociology

This also reinforced our previous findings.

Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development

These previous findings support our results [6, 37 45].

JA Clinical Reports

We discuss these results in terms of previous findings.

Geoscience Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "previous findings" to build a narrative in your writing by showing how current research connects with existing knowledge.

Common error

Avoid making overly broad statements about "previous findings" without providing specific examples or citations. This can lead to misinterpretations or weaken the credibility of your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "previous findings" functions as a noun phrase that typically serves as a subject or object in a sentence. It refers to results or conclusions that have been established in earlier studies or investigations. As Ludwig AI indicates, it's a common and accepted phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

66%

Science & Research

15%

Academia

8%

Less common in

News & Media

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "previous findings" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase, especially within scientific and academic domains. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and widespread acceptance. Its purpose is to effectively refer to earlier research, offering context and support to current studies. While alternatives like "prior research" or "earlier studies" exist, "previous findings" remains a strong and clear choice for formal writing. Remember to always cite your sources meticulously when referencing "previous findings".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prior research

Focuses on the research aspect, similar to "previous findings" but emphasizes the research process.

earlier studies

Highlights the studies conducted, shifting the focus from the findings themselves.

past results

Emphasizes the outcome of past events or experiments.

existing literature

Refers to the body of published works on a specific topic.

historical data

Highlights data collected or relating to the past.

preceding evidence

Focuses on the evidence that came before the current information.

antecedent research

Suggests research that logically precedes and influences the current work.

established knowledge

Refers to information that is widely accepted and understood.

earlier conclusions

Emphasizes the interpretations drawn from prior work.

background information

Highlights information that provides context for the current study.

FAQs

How can I use "previous findings" in a sentence?

You can use "previous findings" to introduce or support your argument by referring to earlier research. For example: "The current study builds upon "previous findings" that suggest a correlation between exercise and mental health."

What are some alternatives to "previous findings"?

Alternatives include "prior research", "earlier studies", or "past results". The choice depends on the specific context and the aspect you want to emphasize.

Is it better to say "previous findings" or "prior findings"?

Both "previous findings" and "prior findings" are acceptable, but "previous findings" is more commonly used. The best choice depends on the specific context and style preference. Using "previous findings" often implies a direct reference to earlier work.

How do I properly cite "previous findings" in my research paper?

When citing "previous findings", always include a proper citation to the original source. This gives credit to the original researchers and allows readers to verify the information. Use the citation style appropriate for your field (e.g. APA, MLA, Chicago).