prejudicial outcomes

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "prejudicial outcomes" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing negative effects or consequences that may arise from a particular action, decision, or situation. Example: "The study revealed that certain policies could lead to prejudicial outcomes for marginalized communities."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"When group membership coincides with a sensitive attribute, such as race, gender, disability, or religion, this situation can lead to unjust or prejudicial outcomes," wrote Google Brain's Moritz Hardt in a blog post.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

"The prejudicial effect on the jury was not overcome," it said, leading to a miscarriage of justice.

BBC

Failure to identify disease progress early and adjust therapy and the inability to delineate a lack of therapeutic efficacy and expeditiously introduce an alternative therapy are both equally deleterious to optimal management strategy and hence prejudicial to outcome.

BMC Cancer

Additionally, his last minute judgment was not only prejudicial to the outcome of the election but a violation of standing policy designed to avoid such.

Huffington Post

"Such an outcome would be extraordinarily prejudicial to the creditors" of the Madoff company's estate.

The New York Times

This is prejudicial when mortality is the primary outcome, given the huge impact on mortality when such decisions are taken in patients.

Annals of Intensive Care

One critique is that this approach is prejudicial to rare diseases for which appropriate care could make a major difference to individual outcomes [ 38].

BMC Family Practice

"These prejudicial actions are discriminatory and anti-globalization, and I did everything I could to cause a different outcome," Schmidt said.

Vice

"Such articles are irrelevant, prejudicial and confusing.

The New York Times

Using it would be prejudicial, they contend.

The New York Times - Sports

The "fitness removal" could appear prejudicial.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "prejudicial outcomes", ensure the context clearly establishes a link between bias or prejudice and the resulting consequences. Specify the source or nature of the prejudice to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "prejudicial outcomes" when the negative results are not directly caused by bias or prejudice. Simply stating that an outcome is undesirable does not automatically make it prejudicial.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "prejudicial outcomes" functions as a noun phrase, where the adjective 'prejudicial' modifies the noun 'outcomes'. It describes results or consequences that are influenced by prejudice or bias, leading to unfair or unjust effects. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

3%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "prejudicial outcomes" refers to negative consequences stemming from bias or prejudice. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. Its usage is common in news, science, and formal contexts to highlight injustice and advocate for fairness. While seemingly straightforward, it's important to use the phrase accurately, ensuring that the negative outcomes are directly linked to demonstrable prejudice. Related phrases such as "harmful effects" or "biased outcomes" may be more appropriate depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

harmful effects

Focuses on the damaging consequences of a situation, rather than the bias that might cause it.

negative consequences

Emphasizes the unfavorable results, without specifically highlighting any potential bias.

unfair results

Highlights the injustice of the outcome, but doesn't necessarily imply prior prejudice.

biased outcomes

Directly addresses the partiality inherent in the results, but lacks the emphasis on detriment.

detrimental effects

Similar to harmful effects, but more formal and emphasizes the damage caused.

adverse consequences

A more formal alternative to negative consequences, emphasizing the unfavorable nature of the results.

inequitable outcomes

Highlights the lack of fairness in the results, particularly in distribution or opportunity.

discriminatory results

Directly addresses the act of discrimination leading to the outcome.

unjust consequences

Similar to unfair results, but may carry a stronger connotation of moral wrong.

damaging repercussions

Emphasizes the far-reaching and harmful impact of the outcomes.

FAQs

How can "prejudicial outcomes" be avoided?

To avoid "prejudicial outcomes", it's essential to implement fair and unbiased processes, promote diversity and inclusion, and actively challenge discriminatory practices. Regularly audit systems and policies to identify and address potential sources of bias.

What are some examples of areas where "prejudicial outcomes" can occur?

"Prejudicial outcomes" can arise in various domains such as criminal justice, employment, education, and healthcare, where biases can influence decisions and create disparities.

What's the difference between "unfair outcomes" and "prejudicial outcomes"?

While both terms describe negative or unjust results, "prejudicial outcomes" specifically imply that the outcomes are caused by some form of bias or prejudice, whereas "unfair outcomes" may arise from other factors.

What can I say instead of "prejudicial outcomes"?

You can use alternatives like "harmful effects", "negative consequences", or "biased outcomes" depending on the specific context you want to convey.