Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
practitioners argue that
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "practitioners argue that" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when presenting a viewpoint or claim made by professionals or experts in a particular field. Example: "In recent studies, practitioners argue that early intervention can significantly improve outcomes for children with developmental delays."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
10 human-written examples
Many development practitioners argue that broader economic progress will ultimately remove the causes of child labour and slavery.
News & Media
Practitioners argue that the brain's habit of reliving past stresses and worrying about potential future problems can become an obstacle to mental health.
News & Media
Community justice practitioners argue that the justice system has long ignored its biggest clients-citizens and neighborhoods that suffer the everyday consequences of high crime levels.
Academia
Some medical practitioners argue that uniform federal regulation of medical practices is essential to curb the recent increase of abuse of pharmaceutical drugs.
Academia
Practitioners argue that the lock-up can be attributed to a business purpose other than the acquisition and that the lock-up could be a standalone agreement, separate and apart from the acquisition.
Academia
Practitioners argue that correctly placed needles cure disorders by unblocking the flow of a person's vital energy.
Science & Research
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
50 human-written examples
Consequently, it is difficult to accept life-long treatment for a condition that is asymptomatic, with many TCM practitioners arguing that they can cure hypertension.
Science
A small number of practitioners argued that a discourse emphasizing public safety was being disingenuously bandied about as a political pretext for increased regulatory control over low-risk clinical activities, for instance: One regulates activities that are dangerous.
However, other general practitioners argued that contemporary health care requires a radical change in how confidentiality and privacy are defined (from a property of the individual doctor-patient relationship, mediated by the human qualities of the doctor, to a property of the system as a whole, mediated by technical and operational security measures).
Science
Statisticians could argue that point.
News & Media
Singapore is big in trusts—unregistered asset-protection vehicles that practitioners argue are "relationships" rather than owned entities.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "practitioners argue that", ensure that the "practitioners" are indeed recognized experts or professionals in their respective fields to lend credibility to the argument being presented. Provide context about their expertise if necessary.
Common error
Avoid attributing a single viewpoint to all "practitioners" in a field. Qualify the statement with phrases like "some practitioners argue" or "many practitioners argue" to accurately reflect the diversity of opinions within the profession.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "practitioners argue that" serves as an attribution marker, indicating that a particular viewpoint or claim is being presented as the opinion of professionals or experts in a given field. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used to introduce expert perspectives.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
30%
Academia
30%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "practitioners argue that" is a versatile phrase used to introduce expert opinions or claims, lending credibility to the statements that follow. As Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, this phrase is considered appropriate for various contexts, particularly within academic, scientific, and news-related domains. When using this phrase, ensure the identified "practitioners" genuinely hold relevant expertise to avoid misattribution. While common, remember to qualify statements to accurately represent the diversity of opinions within any professional field, such as "some practitioners argue".
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Experts in the field argue that
Adds "in the field" to clarify the expertise of the "experts" while maintaining the core meaning.
Practitioners posit that
Uses "posit" instead of "argue", indicating that practitioners are putting forward a statement.
Experts contend that
Replaces "practitioners" with "experts" and uses "contend" instead of "argue", indicating a strong assertion.
Professionals assert that
Substitutes "practitioners" with "professionals" and employs "assert" instead of "argue", suggesting a confident statement.
Practitioners claim that
Replaces "argue" with "claim", suggesting a potentially debatable point.
Specialists maintain that
Replaces "practitioners" with "specialists" and uses "maintain" instead of "argue", implying a sustained belief.
Authorities suggest that
Substitutes "practitioners" with "authorities" and employs "suggest" instead of "argue", conveying a recommendation based on expertise.
Clinicians propose that
Replaces "practitioners" with "clinicians" implying a medical context, and "propose" instead of "argue", which indicates suggesting an idea.
Researchers indicate that
Replaces "practitioners" with "researchers", and "indicate" instead of "argue", softening the tone to a signal of observation.
Analysts find that
Replaces "practitioners" with "analysts" suggesting a review perspective, and "find" instead of "argue", which indicates results oriented approach.
FAQs
How can I use "practitioners argue that" in a sentence?
The phrase "practitioners argue that" introduces a claim or perspective held by professionals in a specific field. For example, "Practitioners argue that early intervention is crucial for optimal outcomes."
What are some alternatives to "practitioners argue that"?
Alternatives include phrases such as "experts contend that", "professionals assert that", or "specialists maintain that", depending on the specific context and desired emphasis.
Is it always necessary to specify which practitioners hold a certain view?
While not always necessary, specifying which practitioners or groups of practitioners hold a particular view can add credibility and nuance to your writing. For example, "Researchers at Harvard argue that..."
What is the difference between "practitioners argue that" and "the evidence suggests that"?
"Practitioners argue that" indicates a viewpoint or interpretation offered by professionals, while "the evidence suggests that" points to conclusions drawn from empirical data or factual information. The former emphasizes expert opinion, whereas the latter emphasizes objective findings.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested