practical arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "practical arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing reasoning or points that are based on real-world applications or considerations. Example: "In the debate about renewable energy, the speaker presented several practical arguments that highlighted the benefits of solar power."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

39 human-written examples

But he portrayed himself as a moderate, preferring to press his case using practical arguments.

The New York Times

Yet for states, economic and practical arguments may prove more persuasive than humanitarian concerns.

The New York Times

By the end of Estlund's analysis, there were only two practical arguments against epistocracy left standing.

The New Yorker

President Bush rejected the moral and practical arguments in favour of advice from John Yoo, Jack Bauer and Joe Stalin.

The Guardian - Opinion

There are, of course, practical arguments for senators to try for the White House as soon as they can.

The New York Times

Even the most practical arguments for artificial logs, though, are treated with skepticism by some in western Montana.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

21 human-written examples

The practical argument is that cursive is faster.

The New York Times

"But it's hard for me to make a practical argument for it.

The New York Times

In addition, she offered a practical argument for a review outside the executive branch: avoiding mistakes.

The New York Times

Pascal's wager, Practical argument for belief in God formulated by Blaise Pascal.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He made a practical argument for MeshNetics, and a global one, and a patriotic one.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "practical arguments", ensure they are supported by evidence and consider potential counterarguments to strengthen your position.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on abstract principles without grounding your arguments in practical realities. Balance theoretical considerations with tangible benefits or consequences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "practical arguments" primarily functions as an adjective-noun combination used to describe arguments that are grounded in reality and feasibility. As Ludwig AI suggests, it’s used to define points based on real-world applications or considerations. Examples in Ludwig show its use in various contexts, from politics to economics.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Science

27%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "practical arguments" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to describe reasoning rooted in real-world applications. As Ludwig AI highlights, it's applicable across diverse contexts, including news, science, and encyclopedic content. While alternatives like "realistic reasoning" or "pragmatic justifications" exist, the key is to ensure such arguments are well-supported by evidence and balanced with theoretical considerations to avoid overgeneralization. Using this expression effectively means grounding abstract principles in tangible benefits, making it a persuasive tool in discussions and debates.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

realistic reasoning

Focuses on the realism and feasibility of the reasoning.

pragmatic justifications

Highlights the pragmatic or practical nature of the justifications.

workable rationale

Emphasizes that the rationale is capable of working or being put into practice.

feasible reasoning

Underlines the possibility and ease of implementation of a thought process.

functional reasoning

Highlights how arguments are based on functionality.

commonsense rationale

Emphasizes that the rationale is based on common sense and ordinary reasoning.

down-to-earth reasoning

Highlights the realistic and pragmatic nature of reasoning.

expedient considerations

Focuses on the convenience and practicality of considerations.

tangible reasons

Reasons are more concrete and evident.

grounded arguments

Focuses on that arguments are based on facts and real events.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "practical arguments" in a debate?

Support your "practical arguments" with real-world examples and data to demonstrate their feasibility and effectiveness. Also, acknowledge and address potential drawbacks to build credibility.

What are some alternatives to "practical arguments"?

You can use alternatives like "realistic reasoning", "pragmatic justifications", or "workable rationale" to convey a similar meaning depending on the specific context.

Are "practical arguments" more effective than moral arguments?

The effectiveness of "practical arguments" versus moral arguments depends on the audience and context. "Practical arguments" often appeal to those focused on tangible outcomes and efficiency, while moral arguments resonate with those driven by ethical considerations.

What makes an argument "practical"?

An argument is considered "practical" when it is based on real-world feasibility, tangible benefits, and demonstrable outcomes rather than abstract theories or ideals.