powers granted to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "powers granted to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, formal, or governmental contexts to refer to authority or rights that have been officially given to someone or something. Example: "The constitution outlines the powers granted to the federal government."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The lower house of Congress repeals special powers granted to Mr Cavallo.

The Guardian

But unlike other powers granted to elected officials, this one came with no restrictions.

The New York Times

Most of the new powers granted to the spooks have to do with surveillance and information-sharing.

The Economist

However, the government is exercising the full extent of the legal powers granted to it under the state of emergency.

The Guardian

Civil liberties groups also expressed disquiet over the new police-like powers granted to other government agencies.

The Guardian - Opinion

The OFT carries out this work using the powers granted to it under consumer and competition legislation.

The Guardian - Money

More dismaying for MEPs, few voters seem aware of the sweeping new powers granted to parliament by the Amsterdam treaty.

The Guardian

There has been no response to the widespread criticism of the restricted powers granted to judicial commissioners.

The Guardian - Opinion

The Constitution outlines the specific powers granted to the national government and reserves the remainder to the states.

Britannica

Agents in Miami have relied in part on expanded financial powers granted to them under the USA Patriot Act.

The New York Times

An English backlash against the extra powers granted to Scotland could cause a surge in votes for UKIP, denying the Conservatives a majority.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "powers granted to", clearly identify both the source of the power and the entity receiving the power to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of "powers granted to the authority", specify "powers granted to the local authority by the state legislature".

Common error

Do not use "powers granted to" without specifying who granted the powers and to whom they were granted. Vague references can lead to misinterpretations and legal challenges. Always provide clear and specific details.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "powers granted to" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, specifying the source or basis of authority. It indicates that the powers in question have been formally or officially given to someone or something. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Encyclopedias

15%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Science

7%

Formal & Business

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "powers granted to" is a commonly used prepositional phrase that indicates the source and extent of authority. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and frequently used in formal contexts such as legal documents, news reports, and academic papers. Its primary function is to specify the origin of authority, ensuring clarity and accountability. When using this phrase, it's crucial to identify both the grantor and the recipient of the powers to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "authorities conferred upon" or "rights vested in" exist, "powers granted to" remains a standard and widely understood expression in formal English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

authorities conferred upon

Focuses on the act of conferring authority, emphasizing the source of the power.

authority delegated to

Emphasizes the transfer of authority from a higher power.

jurisdiction conferred on

Specifically refers to legal or judicial authority being granted.

rights vested in

Highlights the legal aspect of possessing rights, suggesting a formal entitlement.

competencies assigned to

Refers to the specific skills or abilities delegated to a role or entity.

prerogatives assigned to

Implies exclusive rights or privileges given to a specific entity.

mandate given to

Highlights the official authorization or instruction to carry out a specific task.

privileges extended to

Emphasizes the granting of special advantages or exemptions.

responsibilities entrusted to

Focuses on the idea of assigning duties and obligations, emphasizing trust.

licence afforded to

Suggests permission or freedom to act within certain boundaries.

FAQs

How do I use "powers granted to" in a sentence?

Use "powers granted to" to specify the authority or rights officially given to someone or something. For example, "The constitution defines the "powers granted to" the president."

What can I say instead of "powers granted to"?

You can use alternatives like "authorities conferred upon", "rights vested in", or "authority delegated to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "authorities granted to" instead of "powers granted to"?

While both are grammatically sound, ""powers granted to"" is more common and generally preferred in formal and legal writing. "Authorities granted to" can be used, but ensure it fits the tone and context.

What is the difference between "powers granted to" and "responsibilities assigned to"?

"Powers granted to" refers to the authority or rights given to an entity, while "responsibilities assigned to" refers to the duties or obligations that an entity is expected to fulfill. Powers enable actions, while responsibilities mandate them.