power-sharing agreement

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "power-sharing agreement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts involving political arrangements where different parties agree to share control or authority. Example: "The two rival factions reached a power-sharing agreement to ensure stability in the region."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

But he ruled out a power-sharing agreement.

The New York Times

We have 18 months to broker the power-sharing agreement in Kabul that might prevent this.

Independent

America is trying to bolster it by coaxing Mr Sharif into a power-sharing agreement.

The Economist

Iraq's unity government is showing increased signs of splintering over an American-backed power-sharing agreement.

The New York Times

But its result could rock the Good Friday power-sharing agreement.

The Economist

In Zimbabwe a flawed power-sharing agreement has meant that perpetrators have not been held accountable.

The Guardian - Opinion

Senate leaders were finally meeting on Monday to try to work out a power-sharing agreement.

The New York Times

They have obstructed and subverted reforms they agreed to as part of the power-sharing agreement.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

"But the militia has turned off the tap, demanding a power sharing agreement with the central government".

Vice

The new power sharing agreement was concluded by a political marriage between the queen and the Prime Minister.

Wikipedia

The YPG and the government had divided Hassakeh into zones in a power sharing agreement, the Observatory said.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing international relations or political settlements, use "power-sharing agreement" to accurately convey the division of authority among different groups. Ensure context clearly defines the involved parties and scope of the agreement.

Common error

Do not use "power-sharing agreement" when referring to simple collaborations or partnerships that do not involve formal division of political authority. Reserve it for scenarios where governance and control are explicitly shared.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "power-sharing agreement" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a specific type of political arrangement. Ludwig provides numerous examples of its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "power-sharing agreement" is a widely used and understood term in political discourse, denoting a formal division of authority among different groups. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and appears frequently in news media, encyclopedias, and academic discussions. While alternatives such as "coalition government arrangement" or "political compromise arrangement" exist, "power-sharing agreement" succinctly captures the essence of shared governance, particularly in conflict resolution and political stability contexts. Correct usage involves accurately reflecting situations where political authority is explicitly divided and shared, avoiding its application to general collaborations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

shared rule system

This emphasizes the systematic and established nature of power distribution.

political compromise arrangement

This underscores the element of negotiation and concession involved.

national unity government

Emphasizes the goal of uniting a nation through shared power.

coalition government arrangement

This phrase emphasizes the governmental aspect and the temporary nature of the partnership.

co-governance structure

Highlights the joint nature of governing and the organizational aspect.

joint governance framework

This alternative highlights the structured and formal aspects of shared rule.

bipartisan leadership agreement

Implies cooperation between two parties, potentially across ideological lines.

collaborative leadership model

This suggests a more cooperative and less contentious approach to power division.

distribution of authority

Focuses on the allocation of power among different entities.

consociationalism arrangement

A technical term for power-sharing in deeply divided societies.

FAQs

How is a "power-sharing agreement" typically structured?

A "power-sharing agreement" generally involves dividing key governmental positions, cabinet seats, or legislative representation among different political factions or groups. The specifics vary depending on the context and the objectives of the agreement.

What are the potential benefits of a "power-sharing agreement"?

A "power-sharing agreement" can help stabilize conflict-ridden regions, promote inclusivity in governance, and prevent one group from dominating political processes. It fosters cooperation and shared responsibility.

What are the challenges associated with implementing a "power-sharing agreement"?

Challenges include maintaining trust among the parties, managing conflicting interests, ensuring equitable resource distribution, and preventing the agreement from collapsing due to political instability. Often, flawed "power-sharing agreements" may lead to violence.

What are some alternatives to a "power-sharing agreement"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include elections followed by a majority rule government, international mediation, or transitional administrations. Other options are "coalition government arrangement" or "political compromise arrangement".