poorly supported ideas

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poorly supported ideas" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe concepts or arguments that lack sufficient evidence or justification. Example: "The article presents several poorly supported ideas that fail to convince the reader of the author's argument."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The tone is rasping, thin and, in general, poorly supported.

The New York Times - Arts

The essay was cryptic and poorly supported by empirical evidence.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Which then translates into the project being poorly supported.

Huffington Post

Clade 1 was poorly supported (bootstrap<50).

Plosone

Other differences are poorly supported in both results.

Plosone

Subtypes 2b and 2i also formed clusters, although poorly supported.

Plosone

However, this branch is poorly supported.

Genome Biology and Evolution

We know we've hired talented people, and we genuinely want them to succeed". The company's hypothesis was that many of these individuals might be misplaced or poorly managed, and a detailed analysis supported that idea.

Harvard Business Review

Not surprisingly, Wall Street supported the idea.

The New York Times

Obama supported the idea, aides said.

The New York Times - Magazine

I've long supported the idea.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When criticizing "poorly supported ideas", clearly articulate the specific weaknesses in their evidence or reasoning to make your critique more effective.

Common error

Avoid dismissing entire arguments solely because some ideas within them are "poorly supported". Instead, focus on the specific problematic elements and their impact on the overall argument's validity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poorly supported ideas" functions as a descriptor, specifically highlighting the insufficient justification or evidence backing certain concepts. It serves to critique the validity or reliability of the ideas under discussion. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "poorly supported ideas" serves as a critical descriptor for concepts lacking sufficient evidence or justification. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English. While instances of the phrase are limited, its intent is to express skepticism and evaluate the validity of arguments. Alternatives such as "unsubstantiated claims" or "weakly justified arguments" offer similar critical perspectives. When employing this phrase, it's best to provide specific critiques of the weaknesses in evidence or reasoning. The absence of the phrase means a very low frequency of usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unsubstantiated claims

Replaces "ideas" with "claims" and "poorly supported" with "unsubstantiated", emphasizing the lack of evidence.

weakly justified arguments

Substitutes "ideas" with "arguments" and "poorly supported" with "weakly justified", focusing on the inadequacy of the justification.

tenuous theories

Replaces "poorly supported" with "tenuous", indicating a weak or shaky foundation.

flimsy notions

Replaces "poorly supported" with "flimsy", suggesting a lack of substance or strength.

ill-founded concepts

Replaces "poorly supported" with "ill-founded", focusing on the lack of a solid base.

unconvincing propositions

Shifts the focus to the lack of persuasiveness of the ideas.

inadequately evidenced assertions

Highlights the insufficient evidence backing the assertions.

speculative hypotheses

Emphasizes the conjectural nature of the ideas.

baseless assumptions

Focuses on the absence of a factual basis for the assumptions.

unproven conjectures

Replaces "ideas" with "conjectures" and highlights their lack of proof.

FAQs

How can I use "poorly supported ideas" in a sentence?

You can use "poorly supported ideas" to describe arguments or theories that lack sufficient evidence. For example, "The researcher's conclusions were based on "poorly supported ideas" and anecdotal evidence."

What is an alternative to saying "poorly supported ideas"?

Alternatives include "unsubstantiated claims", "weakly justified arguments", or "tenuous theories", depending on the specific context.

What makes an idea "poorly supported"?

An idea is "poorly supported" when there is a lack of credible evidence, logical reasoning, or empirical data to back it up. It may rely on assumptions, anecdotes, or flawed methodology.

Is it always wrong to present "poorly supported ideas"?

Not necessarily. Presenting "poorly supported ideas" can be acceptable in exploratory discussions or brainstorming sessions, as long as they are acknowledged as such and not presented as definitive conclusions. However, in formal arguments or research, it's crucial to prioritize well-substantiated claims.