poorly efficient

USAGE SUMMARY

'poorly efficient' is a correct phrase in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something that is not working as well as it should, or when something is not achieving its intended purpose. For example: "The factory's production processes are poorly efficient; it produces far fewer products than it is capable of."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

In the present study, the results show that the use of a bifrequency excitation drastically enhances thrombolysis efficiency in the intensity range where a monofrequency excitation is poorly efficient.

BioMed Research International

These species are poorly efficient at carbon accumulation because of their limited growth response to canopy openings and competition alleviation.

Forest Ecosystems

Whereas the German system is often considered as expensive and poorly efficient, people in Japan are viewed as healthy and health care as comparatively cheap.

Public Health

Status of ocular inflammation: In a non-inflamed eye, the anterior route is poorly efficient, and hence, antibiotics (vancomycin, aminoglycosides, erythromycin and rifampicin) eliminated by this route show long half-life values.

Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection

Results Connection of the spacer before the humidification chamber was always poorly efficient, whatever the HFT flow rate used or respiratory pattern simulated, with masses collected ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 % of the nominal dose.

Annals of Intensive Care

Since conventional wastewater treatment plants, mainly based on biological processes, are poorly efficient for the treatment of toxic and/or non-biodegradable and/or highly concentrated effluents, new solutions are being looked for.

Catalysis Today

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

An important challenge in HD is the development of efficient therapies to halt or slow down disease progression, because the therapies investigated to date have been poorly effective.

Cell Death and Disease

The hemagglutinin of 2013 avian-origin H7N9 influenza virus is poorly adapted for efficient human-to-human transmission.

Science Magazine

While the 3rd generation PKCδ inhibitory compounds such as BJE6-106 are more potent and more cytotoxic to tumor cells and CSCs than previous generations, they have not been optimized for drug-like properties and are highly hydrophobic and poorly bioavailable, making efficient delivery of this generation of compounds in vivo unreliable.

BMC Cancer

Efficient but poorly trained wait staff.

The New York Times

NLCs facilitate efficient loading of poorly water soluble drugs with simple methods of drug loading.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "poorly efficient", clearly specify what is not performing efficiently and the reasons behind the inefficiency to provide context and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "poorly efficient" without specifying which aspect is inefficient. For example, instead of saying "the system is poorly efficient", specify "the system is poorly efficient in processing large datasets".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poorly efficient" functions as an adjective phrase, typically modifying a noun to describe its level of effectiveness or performance. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "poorly efficient" is a grammatically correct adjective phrase used to describe something that operates ineffectively or suboptimally. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates it's used across various domains, particularly in scientific and technical contexts. While "inefficient" is a more concise alternative, "poorly efficient" emphasizes the degree of inefficiency. When using the phrase, provide context to clarify what specifically is not performing well. Ludwig's analysis of the provided examples and external sources, ensure that this phrase is acceptable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inefficient

A direct synonym, indicating a lack of efficiency.

not very efficient

Expresses a lower degree of efficiency compared to what is expected.

less than efficient

Highlights a deficiency in efficiency.

suboptimal efficiency

More technical term suggesting efficiency is below the optimum level.

low efficiency

Directly states that the level of efficiency is low.

unproductive

Focuses on the lack of output resulting from the inefficiency.

ineffective

Highlights the inability to achieve the desired result.

not up to par

Informal way of saying that something doesn't meet the required standard of efficiency.

wasteful

Emphasizes the squandering of resources due to inefficiency.

clumsy

Describes the process as lacking smoothness and dexterity.

FAQs

What does "poorly efficient" mean?

The phrase "poorly efficient" describes something that does not perform its function effectively or optimally, often resulting in wasted resources or lower output.

How can I use "poorly efficient" in a sentence?

You can use "poorly efficient" to describe processes, systems, or methods that are not working as well as they should. For instance, "The old machinery was "poorly efficient", leading to frequent breakdowns".

What are some alternatives to "poorly efficient"?

Some alternatives include "inefficient", "not very efficient", or "suboptimal efficiency". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "poorly efficient"?

While "inefficient" is a more common and concise term, "poorly efficient" can be used for emphasis or to highlight the degree of inefficiency. It suggests something is not just inefficient, but remarkably so.