poorer quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poorer quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is of lower quality compared to another item or standard. Example: "The cheaper materials resulted in a product of poorer quality than we had anticipated."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The Nauruan schools were poorer quality.

The Guardian

They also had a local but poorer quality source.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The second yet equally unlikely reason is that developers have started submitting poorer quality applications.

The Guardian

Both these proposals if taken forward will result in poor quality homes and poorer quality developments.

The Guardian

One other, much poorer quality, reproduction exists, lacking the detail of the frame.

The Guardian - Arts

Furthermore, more evidence suggested that sanctions led to poorer quality, temporary or unstable employment.

The Guardian - Opinion

The poorer quality of the land makes an agricultural boom harder.

The Guardian - Business

You are left with a rump of poorer quality housing so you create mini-ghettoes.

The Guardian

They always mix the good rice with poorer quality rice to cheat the customer.

The New York Times

This has led to a poorer quality of life for numerous women around menopause".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The balance of evidence is that for-profit healthcare is poorer quality at greater cost.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing something of "poorer quality", be specific about which aspects are deficient. Instead of simply saying 'the product is of poorer quality', specify 'the product's durability is of poorer quality because of the cheaper materials used'.

Common error

Avoid using "poorer quality" as a vague, catch-all criticism. It's more effective to pinpoint the exact attributes that make the quality inferior, such as texture, performance, or longevity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poorer quality" functions as an adjective phrase modifying a noun. It describes a state of being inferior in comparison to a standard or another item. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

49%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "poorer quality" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote something of a lesser standard. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it serves to negatively evaluate an object, service, or condition. While its register is neutral, it appears most commonly in scientific and news contexts. To enhance clarity in writing, be specific about the deficient aspects when using "poorer quality". Alternatives like "inferior quality" or "substandard quality" can be employed for a more formal tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Inferior quality

Replaces "poorer" with a more formal synonym, emphasizing the substandard nature.

Substandard quality

Highlights that the quality falls below an expected standard.

Lower grade

Focuses on the classification of the item being of a lesser grade or rank.

Decreased quality

Emphasizes the reduction in quality from a previous or expected state.

Reduced quality

Similar to 'decreased quality', but with a slightly different nuance in reduction.

Compromised quality

Indicates that the quality has been negatively affected or diminished.

Deficient quality

Stresses the lack of essential elements in the quality of something.

Second-rate quality

Suggests that the quality is not the best and is considered inferior.

Low-end quality

Implies the quality is at the bottom of a range or scale.

Cheap quality

Directly relates the poorer quality to a lower cost or production standard.

FAQs

How can I use "poorer quality" in a sentence?

You can use "poorer quality" to describe something that is of a lower standard compared to something else. For example, "The cheaper materials resulted in a product of "poorer quality" than we had anticipated."

What's a more formal way to say "poorer quality"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "inferior quality" or "substandard quality" instead of "poorer quality".

Is "poorer quality" grammatically correct?

Yes, "poorer quality" is grammatically correct. It's a common way to express that something has a lower quality compared to something else, or a general expected standard.

Which is correct, "lower quality" or "poorer quality"?

Both "lower quality" and ""poorer quality"" are correct and often interchangeable. "Poorer" might suggest a more noticeable decline in quality than "lower", but the difference is subtle.