poor received

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poor received" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be an incorrect combination of words and does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The feedback from the audience was poor received, leading to a decline in ticket sales."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

To rebut Limbaugh's assertions that under Ronald Reagan the poor received greater tax relief than the rich, he quoted from the Congressional Budget Office's 1992 Green Book.

The New Yorker

But Ms. Anderson says the city is doing nothing to bring them back, pointing out that Charity Hospital, where the poor received heavily subsidized medical care, has not reopened.

The New York Times

Here, the poor received three-quarters of the benefits of legal rulings on health and 100% of the gains from education rulings.Brazilian courts, unlike their Indian and South African peers, rarely consider suits with broad implications.

The Economist

Councils said they were caught in an "impossible situation" as ministers had forced local authorities to pass on £500m in cuts when the scheme was introduced – and there would be further reductions in the discounts the poor received as town hall budgets were squeezed in the coming years.

The Guardian

One study found that over 30% of those who received a ration of subsidised rice and wheat were not poor, and about half of the poor received no ration at all.If work requirements serve simply as a screening device, separating the indigent from the indolent, it does not much matter what labourers are paid to do.

The Economist

As shown in Figure 6, some errors of PDSCH are due to the poor received signal quality, while others are induced from the errors of PDCCH.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

His plan would let any student, not just the poor, receive a voucher.

The New York Times

Why are public hospitals and clinics for the poor receiving more patients in recent times, according to the article?

The New York Times

Too often, those who are poor receive lower quality defense than those who have the means to pay.

The Guardian - Opinion

The desperately poor receive health care through Medicaid, and illegal immigrants are given free health care, too.

The New York Times

So here's another one: stealth cuts in the support for the working poor receive scant media interest.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "poorly received" or "badly received" instead of "poor received" to describe something that wasn't well-liked or accepted.

Common error

Avoid using the adjective "poor" to directly modify the verb "received". The correct form is to use the adverb "poorly".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poor received" attempts to describe the manner in which something was accepted or regarded. However, it's grammatically flawed. According to Ludwig AI, the combination of the adjective "poor" with the verb "received" is incorrect; it should be an adverb such as "poorly" or "badly".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

40%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "poor received" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Although it appears in some sources, as identified by Ludwig, it's best to use alternatives such as "poorly received" or "badly received" to accurately convey that something was not well-accepted. Remember to use adverbs to modify verbs for grammatical correctness and clarity. Ludwig AI advises that this specific word order does not follow standard English grammar rules.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poorly received

Replaces the verb 'received' with the adverb 'poorly' to correctly modify the verb.

badly received

Similar to 'poorly received', this uses the adverb 'badly' to indicate a negative reception.

received poorly

Rearranges the words to create a grammatically correct phrase with the same meaning.

met with disapproval

Replaces "poor received" with a phrase indicating disagreement or rejection.

unfavorably received

Uses an adverb to describe the reception as negative or unwelcome.

not well received

Expresses the idea of a negative reception using a more common and grammatically correct structure.

met with criticism

Indicates that something was received with negative feedback or critique.

greeted with skepticism

Suggests that something was received with doubt or disbelief.

faced opposition

Implies that something encountered resistance or disagreement.

elicited a negative response

Describes the reception in terms of the kind of response it generated.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something wasn't well-received?

Instead of "poor received", the correct phrases are "poorly received" or "badly received".

Is "poor received" grammatically correct?

No, "poor received" is grammatically incorrect. The adjective "poor" cannot directly modify the verb "received". You should use the adverb "poorly" instead.

What does it mean when something is "poor received"?

The intended meaning is that something was not well-accepted or well-liked. However, it's grammatically incorrect and should be rephrased using alternatives like "poorly received" or "met with disapproval".

How can I use "receive" to describe something that gets a negative reaction?

You can use phrases like "badly received", "unfavorably received", or "met with criticism" to convey a negative reception. Avoid the ungrammatical "poor received".