Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
poor reasoning
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "poor reasoning" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a lack of logical thought or flawed arguments in someone's reasoning process. Example: "The conclusion he reached was based on poor reasoning, which undermined the validity of his argument."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
22 human-written examples
To attribute reasons to citizens on the basis of poor reasoning would arguably corrupt the process of public justification.
Science
It is typically employed on the grounds that an individual's morally significant reasons may not be the same as the reasons she actually affirms, which are frequently based on poor information, poor reasoning or incoherent beliefs and desires.
Science
It also causes dehydration, exacerbating the symptoms of hypothermia, including poor reasoning and drowsiness.
News & Media
"It's hard to imagine a more effective combination of poor reasoning and bad policy making.
News & Media
In both cases, poor reasoning could result in an undesirable outcome.
Science
The explanation was dismissed by the recently retired Pooley, who wrote on Twitter that it was based on "poor reasoning.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
38 human-written examples
Higher experiential scores were associated with increased emotional expressivity, superstitious beliefs and poorer reasoning.
It's piss-poor reasoning to argue that, because a lot of people have sacrificed and died in a war, the war should continue (with more people dying) to justify those previous sacrifices.
News & Media
Teaching student nurses to reason clinically is important as poor clinical reasoning skills can lead to "failure-to rescue" of deteriorating patients.
Science
Mora told me that the opinion was sophisticated but displayed "catastrophically poor legal reasoning".
News & Media
Problems resulted from a crisis of perception rather than from poor strategic reasoning.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When critiquing someone's reasoning, be specific about the flaws. Point out the exact logical fallacies or unsupported assumptions contributing to the "poor reasoning".
Common error
Avoid labeling an entire argument as having "poor reasoning" without specifying which parts are weak or flawed. Instead, identify the specific premises or inferences that are problematic.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "poor reasoning" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "poor" modifies the noun "reasoning". It describes the quality of the reasoning process.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
33%
Wiki
9%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
3%
Academia
3%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "poor reasoning" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe flawed or inadequate logical thought processes. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used and understood across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. When using "poor reasoning", it's crucial to be specific about the deficiencies in the argument to avoid overgeneralization and to provide constructive criticism. Alternative phrases like "flawed logic" or "weak rationale" can also be used to convey similar meanings, depending on the specific nuances you want to emphasize.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
flawed logic
Focuses on the presence of errors within the logical structure itself.
weak rationale
Emphasizes the deficiency in the underlying justification or explanation.
unsound judgment
Highlights the compromised decision-making resulting from deficient thought.
deficient analysis
Concentrates on the inadequacy of the analytical process.
faulty deduction
Points to errors in the inferential process.
illogical thinking
Directly addresses the absence of logical coherence.
irrational thought
Indicates a deviation from rational principles.
specious argument
Suggests the argument appears correct but is actually fallacious.
tenuous justification
Emphasizes that the reasoning supporting a claim is weak and unconvincing.
inadequate logic
Highlights that the logic used is insufficient or not good enough.
FAQs
How can I use "poor reasoning" in a sentence?
You can use "poor reasoning" to describe flawed or inadequate logical thought. For example: "The conclusion he reached was based on "poor reasoning" and lacked supporting evidence."
What are some alternatives to saying "poor reasoning"?
Alternatives include "flawed logic", "weak rationale", or "unsound judgment", depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "bad reasoning" or "poor reasoning"?
Both "bad reasoning" and "poor reasoning" are acceptable, but "poor reasoning" may sound slightly more formal and nuanced. The best choice depends on the tone and context of your writing.
What's the difference between "poor reasoning" and "lack of reasoning"?
"Poor reasoning" implies that reasoning was attempted but executed inadequately, whereas "lack of reasoning" suggests an absence of logical thought altogether. They are not interchangeable in all contexts.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested