poor in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "poor in" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to describe a lack or deficiency in a particular quality or resource. Example: "The region is poor in natural resources, making it difficult for the economy to thrive."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Most grew up poor, in broken families.

The New York Times - Books

"They are not truly poor in reality".

The New York Times

They lived poor in rural areas.

The New York Times

So with the rural poor in general.

The New Yorker

Mr. Poberezny grew up poor in Milwaukee.

The New York Times

Borneo is poor in commercial mineral resources.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Hartley's timing was poor in every sense.

The Guardian - Sport

But their countries remain poor in capital.

The New York Times - Books

It's very poor in standard," he said.

The Guardian - Sport

Poor in sector Thames Valley University.

The Guardian - Money

England were very poor in Nice.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "poor in", ensure the context is clear and the specific area of deficiency is explicitly stated to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The soil is poor in nutrients" is more precise than simply stating "The soil is poor".

Common error

Avoid using "poor in" to express a subjective opinion without specifying the deficiency. Saying "The design is poor in execution" is acceptable, but avoid saying "The design is poor" without further clarification about which aspects lack quality.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "poor in" functions as a qualifying adjective phrase, indicating a deficiency or lack of a specific attribute or resource. Ludwig examples show its use in various contexts, from describing regions deficient in resources to skills or attributes where someone is not strong.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "poor in" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate a deficiency or lack of something, as validated by Ludwig AI. It is grammatically correct and applicable across various contexts, particularly in news, media, and scientific discussions. While versatile, it is important to use the phrase with clear context to prevent misinterpretations. Remember, alternatives such as "lacking in" or "deficient in" can provide similar meanings while adjusting the level of formality. With a wealth of examples available, Ludwig confirms its relevance and widespread use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deficient in

Emphasizes a lack or shortage of something necessary or required.

lacking in

Indicates an absence or insufficiency of a particular quality or attribute.

weak in

Suggests a deficiency in strength, skill, or ability.

inadequate in

Highlights that something is insufficient or not good enough for a particular purpose.

short on

Informal way of saying there is not enough of something.

limited in

Implies restrictions or constraints in terms of quantity, quality, or scope.

scarce in

Highlights the rarity or limited availability of something.

impoverished in

Emphasizes a state of being depleted or lacking resources.

resource-poor in

Specifically indicates a lack of resources, whether material or immaterial.

under-resourced in

Focuses on the inadequacy of resources allocated to a particular area or activity.

FAQs

How can I use "poor in" in a sentence?

You can use "poor in" to describe a deficiency or lack of something. For example, "The region is "poor in" natural resources" or "His performance was "poor in" execution".

What are some alternatives to "poor in"?

Alternatives include "deficient in", "lacking in", or "weak in", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "poor in" or "lacking in"?

Both "poor in" and "lacking in" are acceptable, but "lacking in" might sound slightly more formal. The best choice depends on the specific context and desired tone. For example, "The organization is "lacking in" funds".

What does it mean to be "poor in spirit"?

The phrase "poor in spirit" refers to a state of humility and recognition of one's spiritual need, often associated with religious or philosophical contexts. It's different from being materially poor.