"polarization" is a correct word and it is used in written English.
You can use the word "polarization" to refer to a division into two sharply contrasting groups or sets of opinions or beliefs. For example: "The increasing polarization of American politics has led to gridlock in Washington."
In the dipole induced-dipole interaction, the presence of the partial charges of the polar molecule causes a polarization, or dipole induced-dipoleectron dinteraction of the other molecule.
They are usually levorotatory (i.e., they rotate the plane of polarization to the left) when polarized light of wavelengths in the visible range is used.
Second, the presence of molecules that are permanent dipoles temporarily distorts the electron charge in other nearby polar or nonpolar molecules, thereby inducing further polarization.
The first scatter would polarize the electrons and the second scatter would analyze the produced polarization, giving rise to an asymmetry.
The beam of light is intercepted by another polarizer (analyzer in this case) set at 90° to the plane of polarization.
That third variable accounts for the boost from voters Mr Abramowitz says incumbents get by virtue of already being in office.For his 2012 forecast, however, Mr Abramowitz tweaked his model by including a fourth variable, which he labels "polarization", that is designed to account for the increasing polarisation of political discourse in America dating back to the 1996 election.
In this sense, the job polarization "trend" is a business "cycle" phenomenon.
If you want an example of how political polarization is impeding sound economic policy, BABs would be hard to beat.
This means that while real growing polarization is illusory, the perception of polarization could drive the political process.Mr Chambers's conclusion about the independents that they perceive less polarisation than partisans on either side strikes me as the most compelling finding here.
It's "downright wrong", writes Stephanie Pappas, to say that Americans are becoming more divided: "In fact, political polarization among the public has barely budged at all over the past 40 years".
If the need to raise many small donations nevertheless continued to "exacerbate polarization" by exerting pressure to raise funds through relatively purist partisan rhetoric, couldn't we lift that pressure by raising the cap on donations?
