Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
points in common
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"points in common" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to similarities or shared traits between two or more things. For example, "The two novels have many points in common, from their central themes to their settings."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
43 human-written examples
But the performances had interpretive points in common as well: the quartet's signature, in a sense.
News & Media
I wasn't thinking of it, but, it's true, the two pieces have points in common.
News & Media
If Claude Miller has points in common with me, it's more a question of affinity.
News & Media
"But we appreciate the opportunity to identify some points in common and some areas of cooperation".
News & Media
"Homeland" and "The Manchurian Candidate" do have points in common, though.
News & Media
The reasons for those failures are very different though they have important points in common.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
15 human-written examples
They have another point in common.
News & Media
The two sides have a final point in common.
News & Media
D.P.: Well, I agree they're not exactly the same, but the point in common — J.R.R.: Yes, well, they can have a point in common without it being the morally relevant point in common.
News & Media
"I'm saying there are many reasons, and the point in common is these are young Muslims.
News & Media
But what I see is that there's a point in common among those people — they're Muslims".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing different subjects, clearly specify the "points in common" to provide a focused and understandable analysis. For example, instead of simply stating that two theories have "points in common", elaborate on what those specific points are.
Common error
Avoid stating that things have "points in common" without specifying what these points are. Overgeneralization can make your writing vague and uninformative. Always provide concrete examples of the similarities you're highlighting.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "points in common" functions as a noun phrase that typically serves as the object of a verb (e.g., "have points in common", "share points in common"). It identifies specific shared attributes or characteristics between two or more subjects. Ludwig provides numerous examples that illustrate this function.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
35%
Encyclopedias
10%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "points in common" is a versatile and frequently used expression to highlight shared characteristics or similarities between different subjects. As verified by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and widely applicable across various domains including news, science, and encyclopedic content. While alternatives like "shared characteristics" or "commonalities" exist, "points in common" is particularly useful when specifying particular shared aspects. A key best practice is to always specify what those "points in common" are to avoid vague or overgeneralized statements.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
shared characteristics
Focuses on the characteristics that are shared, rather than the specific points.
common attributes
Emphasizes the qualities or features that are shared.
similar aspects
Highlights the aspects or features that are alike.
shared features
Stresses the elements or characteristics that are mutually present.
mutual similarities
Highlights the similarities that exist between different entities.
corresponding elements
Indicates elements that have a direct correspondence or similarity.
parallels
Suggests a similarity or analogy between different things.
similarities
A more general term for resemblances or shared qualities.
commonalities
Highlights shared qualities or characteristics.
areas of agreement
Focuses on the aspects where there is alignment or consensus.
FAQs
How can I effectively use "points in common" in a sentence?
To effectively use "points in common", clearly specify the subjects you're comparing and the exact similarities between them. For example, "Despite their different approaches, both researchers share several "points in common", including a focus on sustainability and innovative design."
What are some alternatives to "points in common" that I can use?
You can use alternatives like "shared characteristics", "common attributes", or "similar aspects" depending on the context. All these can replace the original phrase.
Is it better to say "points in common" or "commonalities"?
Both "points in common" and "commonalities" are acceptable, but "points in common" is often used when you want to specify the exact similarities, while "commonalities" is a more general term for shared qualities.
What's the difference between "points in common" and "similarities"?
"Points in common" refers to specific, identifiable shared traits, while "similarities" is a broader term indicating a general resemblance. Use "points in common" when you need to highlight particular shared aspects.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested