Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
places in
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "places in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to specific locations or contexts where something occurs or is found. Example: "There are many beautiful places in the city that are worth visiting."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(2)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Smoke rose in places in the city.
News & Media
Of all the places in the Park.
News & Media
Beaches are sacred public places in Australia.
News & Media
Polling places in 25 provinces were affected.
News & Media
We could trade places in an instant.
News & Media
They switched places in free agency.
News & Media
All places in the religions are taken.
News & Media
There are places in between.
News & Media
Strangers save places in line.
News & Media
London plumbers are buying places in Portugal.
News & Media
There are nonsmoking places in Princeton".
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "places in", ensure the context clearly defines what larger entity the places are located within. For example, "places in the city" is clearer than just "places".
Common error
Avoid using "places in" without a clear reference to the larger containing entity. For example, saying "good places in" is incomplete; specify "good places in the neighborhood".
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "places in" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying nouns by specifying location or inclusion. Ludwig's examples show its use in various contexts, like "polling places in 25 provinces" and "common rooms are vital places in universities". Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.
Frequent in
News & Media
52%
Wiki
22%
Science
17%
Less common in
Formal & Business
3%
Encyclopedias
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "places in" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to specify locations within a broader context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's versatile and applicable across various domains. To use it effectively, always ensure the context clearly defines the larger entity containing these places. While it is versatile, be mindful of potential vagueness and opt for more specific alternatives like "locations within" or "sites in" when appropriate.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
locations within
Focuses specifically on the interior or confines of a location.
areas within
Emphasizes a specific portion or region inside something.
sites in
Highlights specific locations or points of interest.
spots in
Implies smaller, more specific locations.
regions within
Refers to broader geographical areas inside a larger entity.
points within
Highlights particular locations or spots inside something.
locations inside
Directly indicates that the places are within a certain boundary.
areas inside
Similar to 'areas within' but more straightforward.
positions in
Suggests particular points or placements within a setting.
zones within
Refers to specific areas that have particular characteristics or uses within something.
FAQs
How do I use "places in" correctly in a sentence?
Use "places in" to refer to specific locations within a larger area or context. For example, "There are many interesting "places in" Europe to visit".
What are some alternatives to the phrase "places in"?
You can use alternatives like "locations within", "areas within", or "sites in" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "places in" or "locations in"?
Both "places in" and "locations in" are correct, but "places in" is more general and commonly used. "Locations in" might be preferred in more formal or technical contexts.
How can I make my use of "places in" more specific?
Provide a clear context for the "places". For example, instead of saying "beautiful places", specify "beautiful "places in Italy"" or "beautiful "places in the park"".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested