Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
personalities that
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "personalities that" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to specific traits or characteristics of individuals or groups in a descriptive context. Example: "The study focused on personalities that exhibit high levels of empathy and emotional intelligence."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
Personalities that can overstay their welcome.
News & Media
"That becomes secondary to the personalities that are involved".
News & Media
Personalities that don't change from role to role.
News & Media
"There were seven other personalities that opened up that day.
News & Media
They have similarly serene personalities that sometimes make them seem a little detached.
News & Media
And then you have certain personalities that are extremely prone to not wanting to do it".
News & Media
And on HGTV it's the personalities that have room for improvement.
News & Media
The clothing amplified the personalities that were as different as Roger Federer's and Rafael Nadal's.
News & Media
Some species have personalities that vary between shy and bold, active and passive.
News & Media
Like people, restaurants have personalities that extend beyond their physical attributes.
News & Media
Many affected warm proxy personalities that were chummy and distant, like teachers'.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "personalities that", ensure that the subsequent clause clearly defines the specific attribute or characteristic you are highlighting. For instance, "personalities that are outgoing" is more effective than simply "personalities that matter".
Common error
Avoid using "personalities that" in overly broad statements. Instead, specify the trait or behavior that distinguishes these personalities. For example, instead of saying "personalities that are successful", clarify it as "personalities that demonstrate resilience and strategic thinking".
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "personalities that" functions as a relative clause introducing additional information about the described personalities. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates that it is commonly used to specify traits or characteristics associated with certain individuals.
Frequent in
News & Media
61%
Science
19%
Wiki
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
3%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "personalities that" is a versatile relative clause used to specify traits or characteristics of individuals. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and frequently used across diverse sources, especially in news, science, and general contexts. To maximize clarity, ensure that you specify the attribute that distinguishes these personalities and avoid overgeneralization. Consider alternative phrases like "individuals who" or "characters who" for variety. Remember that while "personalities that" can be used in both formal and informal contexts, its overall tone is generally neutral.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
people that
A more generic reference to humans, applicable in a wide range of contexts.
individuals who
Focuses on people as distinct entities, shifting from 'personalities' to a more general term.
those individuals who
Adds a level of formality and specificity compared to the original phrase.
characters who
Emphasizes roles or personas, particularly in fictional or narrative contexts.
figures that
Highlights prominence or notability, suggesting individuals of significance.
persons who
A more formal and often legalistic way of referring to people.
leaders who
Specifically refers to individuals in positions of authority or influence.
minds that
Highlights intellectual capacity or thought processes, diverging from general personality.
souls that
Focuses on the inner or spiritual aspects of individuals.
identities that
Shifts the focus to the roles or characteristics that define a person or group.
FAQs
How can I use "personalities that" in a sentence?
You can use "personalities that" to describe a group of people or characters who share specific traits. For instance, "The study examined "personalities that" exhibit high levels of creativity and innovation".
What are some alternatives to using "personalities that"?
Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "individuals who", "characters who", or "figures that" to convey similar meanings while varying your language.
Is "personalities that" formal or informal?
"Personalities that" is generally considered neutral in tone and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. The formality often depends more on the surrounding vocabulary and the overall style of writing.
What's the difference between "personalities that" and "people who"?
While both phrases refer to individuals, "personalities that" often emphasizes specific traits or characteristics, whereas "people who" is a more general reference to individuals without necessarily highlighting particular attributes. It depends on the nuance you intend to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested