Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
patently absent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "patently absent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is clearly or obviously missing or lacking. Example: "The evidence was patently absent from the report, raising questions about its validity."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Those proxies – vitrine builders, cryogenic engineers and the rest – aren't actually present in the work, but they do allow the artists to be patently absent from it.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
The expectation that Dad will be absent from the delivery room, opting instead to hand out cigars in the waiting room like Don Draper, now seems patently ridiculous.
News & Media
Patently untrue.
News & Media
Argentina patently.
News & Media
Patently, that's progress.
News & Media
"That's patently obvious.
News & Media
This is patently untrue.
News & Media
This was patently absurd.
News & Media
That is patently unsustainable.
News & Media
This was patently false.
News & Media
This is patently unfair.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "patently absent" to emphasize that something's absence is not just missing, but conspicuously and undeniably so, lending a formal and assertive tone to your writing. Reserve it for situations where the absence is a key point.
Common error
Avoid using "patently absent" in casual conversations or informal writing. The phrase's formal tone can sound stilted or overly assertive in relaxed settings.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "patently absent" functions as an adverb-adjective combination, modifying a noun or pronoun to describe something that is clearly and undeniably missing or lacking. As Ludwig AI confirms, it suggests more than simple absence; it implies a conspicuous and obvious lack.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Science
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "patently absent" is a phrase used to describe something that is obviously and undeniably missing. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is grammatically correct, though its usage is relatively rare. It is most commonly found in news and media contexts, where its formal tone lends itself well to assertive statements. While it can be substituted with alternatives like "clearly missing" or "obviously lacking", "patently absent" emphasizes the conspicuous and undeniable nature of the absence.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
Clearly missing
Emphasizes the obvious lack of something.
Obviously lacking
Highlights the evident deficiency.
Plainly not present
Stresses the straightforward absence.
Conspicuously absent
Focuses on how noticeable the absence is.
Evidently not there
Indicates the lack of presence is apparent.
Manifestly missing
Highlights that the absence is undeniable.
Unmistakably absent
Suggests no confusion about the absence.
Indisputably lacking
Indicates the absence is beyond question.
Blatantly missing
Stresses a glaring absence.
Flagrantly absent
Highlights an obvious and offensive absence.
FAQs
How can I use "patently absent" in a sentence?
Use "patently absent" to describe something that is clearly and obviously missing. For example, "The evidence was patently absent from the report."
What are some alternatives to "patently absent"?
Alternatives include "clearly missing", "obviously lacking", or "conspicuously absent", depending on the desired nuance.
Is it more appropriate to say "patently absent" or "obviously absent"?
"Patently absent" is more formal and emphasizes the undeniable nature of the absence, while "obviously absent" is more neutral. Choose based on the tone you want to convey.
When is it best to use "patently absent" over other similar phrases?
Use "patently absent" when you want to highlight that something's absence is not just a simple oversight, but a glaring and unmistakable omission that likely has significance.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested