partners excluded

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "partners excluded" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to specify that partners are not included in a particular situation, event, or agreement. Example: "The meeting will focus on internal strategies, with partners excluded from the discussion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Even at hospitals with antidiscrimination policies, there were several cases of same-sex partners excluded from the bedside of a partner or adopted child.

The New York Times

Note: Men with no heterosexual partners excluded.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

To examine this issue, we fitted the models shown in Table 4 using only non-missing data on sexual partners (excluding cases with missing data rather than imputing their values for this variable).

Plosone

The tour began with a Zionist sweep of the Old City for a nearly all-Jewish audience, myself and my partner excluded.

HuffPost

Condom use with the first partner (excluding spouses) rose to 54% in the youngest cohort.

Plosone

Condom use with the first partner, excluding those whose first partner was their husband, rose from 0% in the oldest women to 41% in the youngest cohort.

Plosone

Specifically we therefore asked if the respondent was "emotionally involved or mutually in love" (quan hê tình cam hoaˇc tình yêu) with his sexual partner, excluding that the partner was casual.

BMJ Open

Rows indicating "no current regular partner" or "no casual partners" are excluded from those variables where additional information is provided (e.g. regular partner type, relationship length, anal modality, condom use).

BMC Public Health

Of the latter participants, two of the men and two of the women had a biological child with partners from a previous relationship and these partners were excluded.

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Two women and 22 partners were excluded or ineligible, leaving 145 women and 85 partners.

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Also, one 29 year old woman and one 47 year old man reporting 255 and 100 partners in the last year, respectively, and an identical number of life-time partners, were excluded because the information was considered incredible.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "partners excluded", ensure the context clearly defines who is considered a "partner" and the reason for their exclusion. This avoids ambiguity and potential misunderstandings.

Common error

Avoid using "partners excluded" without specifying the scope of the exclusion. For example, clarify whether it applies to all types of partners (business, romantic, etc.) or only specific ones.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "partners excluded" functions primarily as an adjective phrase modifying an implied noun (e.g., 'from this event' or 'from consideration'). It denotes a state of being, indicating that partners are not included or permitted. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "partners excluded" is grammatically sound and serves to clearly indicate the non-inclusion of partners in a given context. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans both scientific and news domains, suggesting versatility. While not exceedingly common, it is readily understood and functions effectively as an adjective phrase. When employing this phrase, consider specifying the type of partnership being excluded to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "excluding partners" or "partners not included", depending on the desired emphasis and formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

partners not included

Replaces the verb with a more direct adjective phrase.

excluding partners

Uses a gerund to emphasize the act of excluding.

partners are not allowed

Emphasizes a prohibition or restriction on partners.

partners are barred

Uses a stronger verb to convey a more forceful exclusion.

partners are ineligible

Focuses on the lack of eligibility for partners.

partner participation not permitted

Formal phrasing emphasizing a lack of permission.

no partners

Simplifies the phrase to a more concise statement.

partners omitted

Uses a synonym for excluded to vary the vocabulary.

without partners

Focuses on the absence of partners.

partners are left out

Emphasizes that partners have been forgotten or not chosen.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "partners excluded" to sound more formal?

To sound more formal, consider using phrases such as "partner participation not permitted" or "partners are ineligible".

Is "excluding partners" grammatically correct, and how does it compare to "partners excluded"?

Yes, "excluding partners" is grammatically correct. It uses a gerund to emphasize the act of exclusion, while "partners excluded" is a more concise adjective phrase.

In what situations is it appropriate to use the phrase "partners excluded"?

It's appropriate to use "partners excluded" when you need to clearly state that partners are not allowed or included in a particular activity, event, or arrangement. Be sure to define what type of partner you are referring to.

What's a less direct way of saying "partners excluded" if I want to soften the message?

You could say "partner participation is limited" or "the event is primarily for individuals" as softer alternatives.