Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
participating staff
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "participating staff" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to the employees or team members who are actively involved in a particular event, project, or activity. Example: "The meeting will include all participating staff to discuss the upcoming project deadlines."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(6)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
52 human-written examples
Participant 2, intervention group None of the participating staff reported a lack of technical knowledge or motivation as a factor impeding their daily work, though all appreciated the regular supervisory visits during the study period.
Science
Participating staff expressed an increased sense of wellbeing and pride in working for GNM.
News & Media
All participating staff received training on the package.
Science
All participating staff received both collective and individual training.
Science
However, some EDs require larger groups due to the higher number of participating staff.
Science
With regard to obtaining permission/cooperation of the staff, each participating staff member was personally approached.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
8 human-written examples
OPEN and REDCap also provide "in real time" monitoring of for example recruitment rates, which are distributed to all participating staffs in weekly newsletters.
Science
In order to participate, staff had to send back a consent form and fill out a pre-test questionnaire before the start of classes.
Science
All participating ICU staff members have received training in the study procedures and in protocols for optimal CSE management.
Science
Due to logistical delays in initiating the study at participating sites, staff at two research centers administered the surveys at 4 and 8 months after randomization, respectively.
Science
If clinicians expressed interest in participating, study staff contacted the clinicians and obtained consent to participate.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "participating staff", ensure it's clear what event, project, or activity they are participating in. Providing context improves clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "participating staff" without specifying the event or activity. Instead of saying "All participating staff are required to attend", specify "All participating staff in the training program are required to attend" for better clarity.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "participating staff" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "participating" modifies the noun "staff". It identifies a specific subset of staff members who are actively engaged in a particular activity. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is widely used and grammatically sound.
Frequent in
Science
78%
Formal & Business
12%
News & Media
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "participating staff" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to denote staff members actively involved in a specific activity. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across science, formal business, and news media contexts. To enhance clarity, it's crucial to specify the event or project the staff are participating in. Alternatives like "involved staff" or "engaged staff" can be used for variety. Remember to use "staff" as a collective noun, avoiding the incorrect plural form "staffs".
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
involved staff
Replaces "participating" with "involved", focusing on their engagement.
engaged staff
Uses "engaged" to emphasize the active participation of the staff.
participating personnel
Replaces "staff" with the more formal "personnel".
employees participating
Swaps "staff" for "employees" and maintains "participating" as the main verb.
attending staff
Focuses on the presence of staff members at a particular event or activity.
staff taking part
Uses the phrasal verb "taking part" to convey participation.
contributing staff
Highlights the staff's contribution to a specific task or project.
team members involved
Shifts the focus to team membership and involvement.
registered staff
Suggests that the staff have officially registered to take part.
on-board staff
Emphasizes the staff members that are actively on-board in project execution
FAQs
How to use "participating staff" in a sentence?
You can use "participating staff" to refer to employees actively involved in a project. For example, "The training session is mandatory for all "participating staff"."
What can I say instead of "participating staff"?
You can use alternatives like "involved staff", "engaged staff", or "attending staff" depending on the context.
Is "participating staffs" grammatically correct?
No, "participating staffs" is grammatically incorrect. "Staff" is a collective noun, so the plural form is typically not used. The correct phrase is ""participating staff"".
What's the difference between "participating staff" and "staff members"?
"Participating staff" specifically refers to staff who are actively involved in a particular activity or project. "Staff members" is a more general term that refers to all employees, regardless of their current involvement.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested