parallels with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "parallels with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is usually used to describe similarities between two things. For example, you could say, "The parallels between John's story and Mary's story are remarkable."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The parallels with football are no accident.

The New York Times - Sports

There are other parallels with Scotland.

The Guardian

Others have dismissed the parallels with Spain.

The New York Times

The parallels with Hodgson hum with similarities.

Independent

There are parallels with today.

The Guardian

He sees parallels with Elizabeth.

The New York Times

I saw parallels with Vermeer.

The Guardian

The parallels with the euro are striking.

The Guardian

The parallels with Hamas are clear.

The Guardian - Opinion

Some Americans see parallels with Clinton.

The Guardian - Sport

The parallels with cooking are clear.

The New York Times - Food

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "parallels with", ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "There are parallels with the past", specify "There are parallels between the current economic crisis and the Great Depression."

Common error

Avoid using "parallels with" to imply direct causation. While you can point out similarities between two situations, it doesn't mean one caused the other. Instead, use phrases like "related to" or "influenced by" to indicate causation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "parallels with" functions as a prepositional phrase that connects two elements by highlighting their similarities. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, and the examples provided illustrate its use in drawing comparisons across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

77%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "parallels with" is a grammatically sound and very common way to draw comparisons between different subjects or concepts. As Ludwig AI highlights, the phrase is correct and usable. It is frequently found in news and media, but also appears in scientific and business contexts. When using "parallels with", ensure that the subjects being compared are clearly defined and avoid implying direct causation. Consider alternatives like "similarities to" or "resemblances to" to refine your meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

similarities to

Focuses specifically on the shared characteristics rather than the act of drawing a comparison.

similar to

A more direct and straightforward way to express resemblance.

resemblances to

Highlights the visual or superficial likeness between two subjects.

comparisons to

Emphasizes the act of comparing and contrasting rather than just noting similarities.

bears a resemblance to

A more formal way to describe something that looks or behaves similarly.

analogies to

Suggests a more in-depth, structural similarity between the subjects being compared.

correspondences with

Implies a direct relationship or matching aspect between two elements.

connections to

Highlights a link or association, which may not always be based on direct similarity.

links with

Similar to "connections to" but can also imply a cause-and-effect relationship.

relationship to

Broader term indicating any type of association, not necessarily similarity.

FAQs

How can I use "parallels with" in a sentence?

You can use "parallels with" to draw comparisons between different subjects. For example, "The "parallels with" the 1930s are striking" or "Some Americans see "parallels with" Clinton".

What's a good alternative to "parallels with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "similarities to", "resemblances to", or "comparisons to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

How does "parallels with" differ from "related to"?

"Parallels with" highlights similarities and resemblances, while "related to" implies a connection, which could be causal or correlational. "Parallels with" focuses on shared characteristics, whereas "related to" emphasizes association.

Is it grammatically correct to say "parallels with"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. As Ludwig AI confirms, "parallels with" is a correct and usable phrase in English to indicate similarities between two subjects.