papers under review

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "papers under review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to academic or scholarly articles that have been submitted for evaluation but have not yet been accepted or published. Example: "The findings from my latest research are detailed in several papers under review at various journals."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Impressively, he has produced five academic papers under review at various philosophy and cognitive science journals, several of which have been published.

TechCrunch

Editors may have papers under review that rely on a published result; if it's being called into question, editors need to know about it, he adds. .

Science Magazine

A controversy over the human genome has broken the silence that usually surrounds research papers under review at a scientific journal.

Science Magazine

While this could be done using published papers, it is probably more insightful initially to have access to papers under review, where flaws may still be present.

Science Magazine

This review is limited to extracting CMOC from the papers under review; it is thus only a hypotheses generating exercise.

BMC Health Services Research

There is no uniform approach to capturing work task or exposure information, yielding a diverse taxonomy of classifications used in the papers under review.

American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

He has a similar paper under review showing the same effect with human induced pluripotent stem cells.

The New York Times - Health

And, in a paper under review, the group reports that their three-year survival was significantly greater than that of patients in the study whose doctors did not see the data.

The New York Times - Health

(Fouchier's H5N1 paper, under review by Science, was one of two that triggered the international debate).

Science Magazine

The team that wrote the H5N1 paper under review at Science has grudgingly agreed to do so, says one of its members, virologist Albert Osterhaus of Erasmus MC in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Science Magazine

Immunex denied the charges but appeared to be preparing to argue in court that there is nothing wrong with making use of data from someone else's paper under review.

Science Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to "papers under review", be specific about the context (e.g., journal, conference) to provide clarity. For example: "The paper is currently under review at Nature".

Common error

Don't assume the audience understands the "review" process. Clarify the stage (e.g., initial submission, revision) if needed. A paper can be 'under review' after revisions, not only initially.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "papers under review" functions as a noun phrase, describing academic or research papers that are currently undergoing the evaluation process by a journal or conference. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "papers under review" is a grammatically sound and commonly used term, primarily in scientific and news contexts, to denote academic or research papers that are currently in the evaluation phase but not yet accepted for publication. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While not exceedingly frequent, its usage is consistent across authoritative sources such as Science Magazine and The New York Times. When using the phrase, consider clarifying the context (e.g., the specific journal) to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity about the review stage. Alternatives like "manuscripts in consideration" or "articles awaiting assessment" can be used for variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

manuscripts in consideration

Focuses on the formal term for a document and the act of being evaluated.

articles awaiting assessment

Emphasizes the type of document and the evaluation process.

research works pending review

Specifically refers to research-oriented documents.

submissions in the review process

Highlights the stage of the papers in the academic publishing workflow.

scholarly articles under scrutiny

Emphasizes the critical evaluation aspect of the review process.

documents being evaluated

A more generic phrase that can apply to any type of document, not just academic papers.

unpublished papers in evaluation

Highlights that the papers are not yet available to the public.

pending publications

Focuses on the future publication aspect of the papers.

manuscripts up for review

A more informal way to express that the papers are currently being reviewed.

papers in the editorial pipeline

Highlights the process from submission to potential publication.

FAQs

How do you use "papers under review" in a sentence?

You can use "papers under review" to indicate that certain academic works have been submitted for assessment but a decision hasn't been reached yet. For example: "The scientist has three "papers under review", awaiting publication."

What's a synonym for "papers under review"?

Alternatives include "manuscripts in consideration", "articles awaiting assessment", or "submissions in the review process".

Is it appropriate to cite "papers under review"?

Generally, it's not advisable to formally cite "papers under review" because they haven't been peer-reviewed or validated yet. You can mention them informally as "unpublished results" or "personal communication" with proper attribution.

What is the difference between "papers under review" and "accepted papers"?

"Papers under review" are currently being evaluated by a journal or conference, whereas "accepted papers" have successfully passed the review process and are slated for publication.