papers of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "papers of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to documents or written works that belong to or are associated with a particular person, organization, or subject. Example: "The papers of the late author were donated to the university library for research purposes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

52 human-written examples

Vieuxtemps read George Gissing's The Private Papers of Henry Ryecroft.

The Guardian - Books

So Harvard has bought the papers of Mailer's lover instead.

The Guardian - Opinion

These are the Panama papers of Australia's refugee gulag.

The Guardian

Whatever became of the great morning papers of great cities?

The Guardian

The papers of the obscure: are they garbage?

The New Yorker

Strange cases listed in the papers of 1928.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Paper, of course!

The Guardian

Colored paper of various thicknesses and textures.

The New York Times

Argentina's paper of record.

The Guardian

No paper of any kind.

The New York Times - Magazine

Barbara Sude produced a second paper of note.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to a specific collection of documents, use "papers of" to clearly indicate ownership or origin, for example, "The papers of Thomas Jefferson".

Common error

Avoid using "papers' of" as it implies that the papers belong to multiple entities named 'of'. The correct form is "papers of", indicating papers related to a specific person or entity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "papers of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating possession, origin, or association. Examples from Ludwig show its usage in contexts like "the papers of obscure" individuals or "the papers of Supreme Court Justices". Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

30%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "papers of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase to indicate ownership, origin, or association of documents. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely used across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. It's crucial to avoid the incorrect possessive form "papers' of". Alternative phrases include "documents of" or "writings of", depending on the context. The phrase maintains a neutral register, making it versatile for different communication needs. Common authoritative sources using this phrase are The Guardian, The New Yorker, and The New York Times.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

documents of

Replaces "papers" with a more formal term, emphasizing official records.

writings of

Focuses on the act of writing, suitable when emphasizing authorship.

records of

Emphasizes the historical or archival aspect.

collection of

Highlights the assembled nature of the papers.

correspondence of

Specifically refers to letters and other written communications.

archives of

Implies a formal repository or historical collection.

publications of

Refers to formally published works.

compilation of

Suggests a gathering of various documents into a single collection.

body of work of

Refers to a substantial collection of artistic or intellectual output.

portfolio of

Often used in creative fields to describe a collection of an individual's best work.

FAQs

How can I use "papers of" in a sentence?

Use "papers of" to denote documents or writings belonging to someone or related to a specific topic. For example, "The "papers of Einstein" are invaluable to science."

What are some alternatives to using "papers of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "documents of", "writings of", or "records of", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "papers' of" instead of "papers of"?

No, "papers' of" is grammatically incorrect. The correct usage is "papers of", which indicates that the papers belong to or are associated with a specific person, entity, or subject.

What is the difference between "papers of" and "documents related to"?

"Papers of" usually implies a direct connection or ownership, such as "The papers of a founder". "Documents related to", however, suggests a broader association without necessarily implying ownership or authorship.