records of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "records of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to documentation or evidence of past events, transactions, or activities. Example: "The records of the meeting were distributed to all participants for review."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Records of their….

The New Yorker

(No records of such).

The New York Times - Arts

Records of contenders for N.F.C.

The New York Times

Tobón keeps no records of his work.

The New Yorker

There must be records of that somewhere.

Independent

keeps basic records of the deceased.

The New Yorker

The records of that proceeding are brief.

The New York Times

Like records of land ownership.

The Guardian - Opinion

Others are records of ritualized mortal cruelty.

The New York Times - Arts

Article gives records of founding of Manhattan.

The New Yorker

These agreements are called Records of Decision.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "records of", be specific about what kind of records you are referring to (e.g., "financial records of", "medical records of").

Common error

Avoid using "records for" or "records about" when you mean "records of". The preposition "of" indicates possession or association, which is usually the correct relationship when discussing records.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "records of" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase. It typically modifies a noun, indicating what kind of records are being referenced. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

35%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Reference

3%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "records of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used prepositional phrase that serves to specify the kind of records being referenced. As indicated by Ludwig, this phrase is versatile and applicable across various contexts, from news and media to scientific research and business documentation. While its register varies from neutral to formal, depending on the source, it is essential to use the correct preposition ("of" rather than "for" or "about") and to be specific about the type of records being discussed. Mastering this phrase will enhance clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

documentation of

Emphasizes the act of documenting or providing evidence.

archives of

Refers to a collection of historical documents or records.

registers of

Implies a formal or official list of items or information.

files of

Suggests a collection of documents kept together for reference.

transcripts of

Refers specifically to a written or printed version of spoken material.

chronicles of

Implies a detailed and continuous record of events.

accounts of

Suggests a descriptive report of events or experiences.

logs of

Refers to a detailed record of events, often in a specific context like computing or shipping.

minutes of

Specifically refers to the official record of proceedings at a meeting.

inventory of

Implies a complete list of items or resources.

FAQs

How can I use "records of" in a sentence?

You can use "records of" to refer to documentation or evidence of past events, transactions, or activities. For example: "The "records of" the meeting were distributed" or "Keep "records of" your expenses".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "records of"?

Some alternatives to "records of" include "documentation of", "archives of", and "registers of". The best alternative depends on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "record of" instead of "records of"?

Yes, both are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Record of" typically refers to a single instance or item, while "records of" refers to multiple instances or a collection of items.

What's the difference between "records of" and "details of"?

"Records of" typically implies a formal or official collection of information, while "details of" refers to specific pieces of information, which may or may not be formally recorded.