overturned by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "overturned by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts to indicate that a decision or ruling has been reversed by a higher authority or court. Example: "The previous ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court, leading to a significant change in the law."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In the event it was overturned by a single vote.

The Economist

That process was overturned by the higher court on Tuesday.

The New York Times

The decision was later overturned by an arbitrator.

The New York Times - Sports

(The firm's subsequent conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court).

The New York Times

Mr. Perry's order was later overturned by state lawmakers.

The New York Times

(That decision was later overturned by an appeals court).

The New York Times

Judgment calls have been overturned by baseball, albeit rarely.

The New York Times

Some think it's been overturned by the Supreme Court.

The New York Times

Too bad it was overturned by the 21st".

The New York Times - Arts

The sentence is final unless overturned by the Supreme Court.

The New York Times

Judge Martini was overturned by a federal appeals court.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the subject that is being "overturned" is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify if it's a "ruling", "verdict", or "decision".

Common error

Avoid using "overturned by" when describing physical actions or events. This phrase is generally reserved for legal or formal reversals, not physical disruptions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "overturned by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a prior decision, ruling, or verdict has been reversed or invalidated by an agent. Ludwig AI's examples show its use in legal and formal contexts. It highlights the reversal of authority or a previously established outcome.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Science

3%

Social Media

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

"Overturned by" is a grammatically sound phrase that indicates the reversal of a previous decision or ruling. Ludwig AI confirms its widespread usage across various contexts, particularly in news and legal reporting. Its function is to report factual information, making it a neutral to formal expression. When using "overturned by", it's important to ensure clarity regarding what is being overturned and by whom, avoiding usage in scenarios describing physical events. Alternatives include "reversed by", "nullified by", and "invalidated by", each carrying slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

reversed by

Focuses on the action of reversing a decision or outcome.

overruled by

Specifically used when a higher authority rejects a previous ruling or decision.

nullified by

Indicates that something has been made void or legally invalid.

invalidated by

Emphasizes the lack of legal validity as a result of a new action or decision.

superseded by

Highlights that something newer has replaced the original.

repealed by

Specifically refers to the act of revoking or annulling a law or regulation.

rescinded by

Implies a formal withdrawal or cancellation of an order or agreement.

abrogated by

Suggests a formal or official abolishment of a law or right.

quashed by

Often used in legal contexts to describe the act of nullifying a verdict or indictment.

set aside by

Indicates that a court has cancelled or annulled a previous judgment or decision.

FAQs

How to use "overturned by" in a sentence?

Use "overturned by" to indicate that a previous decision or ruling has been reversed or invalidated by a higher authority. For example, "The lower court's decision was "overturned by" the Supreme Court".

What can I say instead of "overturned by"?

You can use alternatives like "reversed by", "nullified by", or "invalidated by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "overturned by" or "overturned because of"?

"Overturned by" is generally more concise and grammatically correct when indicating the agent that caused the reversal. "Overturned because of" can be used, but it focuses more on the reason for the reversal rather than the agent.

What's the difference between "overturned by" and "vetoed by"?

"Overturned by" typically refers to a legal or formal decision being reversed by a higher authority. "Vetoed by", on the other hand, specifically refers to a decision or law being rejected by an executive authority, such as a president or governor.