orders to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "orders to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to directives or commands given to someone, often in a military or formal context. Example: "The general issued orders to his troops to advance at dawn."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

She ignored orders to stay put.

The New Yorker

Police have orders to shoot to kill.

The Economist

The judiciary received orders to arrest her.

The New Yorker

Offenders routinely ignore orders to get interlocks.

The New York Times

He ignored orders to fire Jews.

The New York Times

But there were few orders to execute.

The New York Times

'There were no sealed orders to open.

The Guardian

They're under orders to read it.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Stronger demand is increasing orders to factories.

The New York Times

Not everyone obeyed orders to leave.

The New York Times

Was someone giving orders to him?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "orders to" when you want to emphasize a chain of command or hierarchical relationship where instructions are being given.

Common error

Avoid using "orders to" when referring to suggestions or requests. The phrase implies a level of authority and obligation that isn't present in more casual forms of communication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "orders to" functions as a prepositional phrase often used to indicate direction or instruction, frequently involving an authority figure directing action. As Ludwig AI exemplifies, it connects the act of ordering with the recipient or object of the order.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "orders to" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate the act of giving instructions or commands, often within a hierarchical structure. Ludwig AI confirms that it is grammatically correct and widely used, particularly in news and business contexts. While its tone can range from neutral to formal, it’s essential to use it appropriately to convey authority and obligation. Alternatives such as "instructions for" or "directives for" may be suitable depending on the context. By understanding its proper usage and potential pitfalls, you can effectively incorporate "orders to" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

commands for

Highlights the authoritative nature of the instructions, often in a military or hierarchical setting.

requirements for

Focuses on the necessary conditions or criteria that must be fulfilled.

directives for

Emphasizes a formal or official set of instructions from a higher authority.

instructions for

Focuses on providing a set of guidelines or directions for completing a task.

directions for

Refers to a clear and straightforward set of instructions for navigating a process or task.

decrees for

Signifies a formal and authoritative order issued by a governing body or leader.

mandates for

Suggests a compulsory or legally binding requirement for a specific action.

stipulations for

Highlights specific conditions or requirements that must be met.

guidelines for

Indicates a set of recommendations or best practices for achieving a desired outcome.

prescriptions for

Implies a specific and detailed set of instructions, often in a medical or technical context.

FAQs

How can I use "orders to" in a sentence?

You can use "orders to" to indicate instructions or commands given. For example: "The general issued "orders to" his troops" or "The company received "orders to" increase production".

What are some alternatives to "orders to"?

Alternatives to "orders to" include "instructions for", "directives for", or "commands for", depending on the level of formality and authority you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "orders to"?

"Orders to" is appropriate when you want to emphasize a clear chain of command or a formal instruction being given. It's often used in military, business, or other hierarchical contexts.

Is "orders to" more formal than "instructions for"?

Yes, "orders to" generally carries a more formal and authoritative tone compared to "instructions for". The latter implies guidance, while the former implies a mandate.