opposing facts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "opposing facts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing two or more pieces of information that contradict each other or present different viewpoints. Example: "In the debate, the speaker presented opposing facts that left the audience confused about the true nature of the issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

* * * Apartments are miniature worlds, unique unto themselves, but they are also like Pez stacked in a Pez dispenser, another pair of opposing facts that are difficult to reconcile.

The New Yorker

And if the facts mean that elements of the theory no longer hold, discard that part of the theory forthwith; persisting with the theory in face of opposing facts will create a false conclusion no matter how much you'd prefer it to be the conclusion.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The collective novel which follows, while still written in the cloak of an historic style, and, therefore, continuously attempting to be scrupulous to the welter of a hundred confusing and opposed facts, will now unashamedly enter that world of strange lights and intuitive speculation which is the novel.

The New Yorker

By agreeing to take part in the Pride Events without addressing and opposing the fact that Israel is actively continuing to oppress Palestinians (gay and straight alike) these celebrities are in fact complicit with the Israeli government's efforts to prevent the world from seeing the horrific reality of daily life for Palestinians living under military occupation.

Huffington Post

Rather than forget passively, then, the brain seems to shed memories actively.Sleep also helps guide memories intended to be retained down particular paths remembering patterns, for example, as opposed to facts.

The Economist

Again, it concerns the seeming inability of some researchers to deal with norms as opposed to facts.

International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility

Truthiness is using your feelings and heart to define the truth, as opposed to facts, which can be "elitist".

Los Angeles Times

This suggests that derivative moral judgements as opposed to facts about drugs – and racialised logic about "criminals" – is shaping UK drug policy.

Vice

But he opposed further fact-finding into why Mr. Hamdi was so designated, saying that an order to the military to produce more material would set a bad precedent.

The New York Times

He opposed the fact that only Mr Juncker's name had been put forward because it excluded the names of others.

BBC

Creationists (certainly traditional Creationists) oppose the fact of evolution, namely that all organisms living and dead are the end products of a natural process of development from a few forms, perhaps ultimately from inorganic materials ("common descent").

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use signal phrases such as "However", "On the other hand", or "In contrast" to clearly indicate when you are introducing "opposing facts".

Common error

Avoid simply presenting "opposing facts" without explaining their origin, relevance, or implications. Provide sufficient background information so your audience can understand the discrepancies and form their own conclusions.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "opposing facts" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "opposing" modifies the noun "facts". As shown by Ludwig, it identifies conflicting or contradictory pieces of information. It is widely accepted as a grammatically correct expression.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "opposing facts" is a grammatically sound and usable expression in English used to describe contradictory pieces of information. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness. While not exceptionally common, it appears across diverse sources including news outlets, scientific journals, and encyclopedias, suggesting its versatility. When using "opposing facts", providing context and clear sourcing is crucial for maintaining credibility. Alternative phrases like "conflicting evidence" or "contradictory information" can offer subtle variations in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicting evidence

Emphasizes the contradictory nature of the evidence presented.

contradictory information

Highlights the inconsistency between different pieces of information.

conflicting reports

Emphasizes contradictory statements from various sources.

differing accounts

Focuses on variations in the narratives or explanations provided.

discrepant data

Emphasizes the lack of agreement or consistency within the data.

inconsistent findings

Highlights the irregularities in the results obtained from different studies or investigations.

contrasting details

Focuses on the differences in specific elements or aspects of the information.

divergent narratives

Highlights the different stories or accounts being presented.

opposing viewpoints

Shifts the focus to differing perspectives or interpretations of the facts.

antithetical truths

Emphasizes opposing nature of truths

FAQs

How can I use "opposing facts" in a sentence?

You can use "opposing facts" to introduce conflicting pieces of evidence or viewpoints within an argument. For instance, "The investigation uncovered "opposing facts" regarding the suspect's alibi".

What is the difference between "opposing facts" and "conflicting evidence"?

"Opposing facts" generally refers to statements or pieces of information that contradict each other, while "conflicting evidence" /s/conflicting+evidence specifically implies evidence presented in a legal or investigative context that doesn't align.

What are some synonyms for "opposing facts"?

Alternatives to "opposing facts" include "contradictory information", "conflicting reports", and "differing accounts", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "opposing facts" in formal writing?

Yes, "opposing facts" is appropriate for formal writing, particularly when presenting balanced arguments or analyzing complex situations where multiple perspectives exist. Ensure that you present the facts objectively and cite your sources properly.