open to liability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "open to liability" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
This phrase is typically used when discussing the potential legal or financial implications of a particular situation or action. For example, "Leaving a hazardous object in a public space may make you open to liability if someone were to get injured."

✓ Grammatically correct

Environmental Sciences Europe

Huffington Post

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The current situation leaves local decision makers open to liability and the populace at risk due to conflict and confusion regarding the standards and their meaning with regard to land use.

Environmental Sciences Europe

But in June 2006 the Supreme Court rejected this theory and held the Geneva Conventions applicable to the treatment of all detainees, leaving the President open to liability for violating the War Crimes Act.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Websites will be open to liabilities if they failed to self-purge the infringing links after receiving requests from the copyright holders.

Harvard University

Unpaid internships can leave employers open to increased liability by financially binding them to students' universities if liabilities arise, such as workers compensation obligations.

Forbes

Mr. Flynn said that S.E.C. officials discussed whether to lie about the document destruction because they might be open to criminal liability.

The New York Times

Michael Leadbetter, president of the Association of Directors of Social Services (ADSS) believes this attitude has be shaped largely from a fear of laying themselves open to financial liability claims.

The Guardian

The industry has pushed back, arguing that accountants would open themselves to liability.

The New York Times

Legal experts say that if Judge Rakoff is successful in requiring commission settlements to specify proven or admitted facts, companies will be less likely to settle because it would open them to liability in shareholder lawsuits.

The New York Times

"It's not clear to me that he's made any false statements in legal documents that could open him to liability for perjury," Hasen said.

Huffington Post

Gerald Arpey, the airline's boss, will step down in favour of the number two, Tom Horton, who is believed to have been more open to shedding liabilities through the bankruptcy courts.Network airlines are, in America and much of the rich world, licences to lose money or make miserly returns and AMR is certainly no exception.

The Economist

"People won't settle with us if they have to admit" wrongdoing, Ms. Schapiro said, because it opens them to liability in civil damages lawsuits.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "open to liability", clearly specify the action or situation that creates the potential for legal or financial responsibility. For example, "Operating without insurance makes the company "open to liability" in case of accidents."

Common error

Avoid using "open to liability" without a specific context. Saying "the project is "open to liability"" is vague. Instead, specify what aspect of the project creates the risk, such as "the project's environmental impact makes it "open to liability" for pollution claims."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "open to liability" functions as a descriptive phrase indicating a state of potential legal or financial responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "open to liability" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that signifies a potential risk of legal or financial responsibility. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correctly used in written English, although relatively rare in occurrence. This phrase is most commonly encountered in news and scientific contexts, typically in discussions about risk management and legal implications. When employing this phrase, ensure that the context is clear and specific to avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "subject to liability" or "exposed to liability" may offer a more precise nuance depending on the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to liability

Replaces "open" with "subject", emphasizing a state of being under the influence or control of liability.

exposed to liability

Substitutes "open" with "exposed", highlighting vulnerability to liability.

potentially liable

Adds "potentially" to emphasize uncertainty about the legal responsibility

at risk of liability

Focuses on the risk aspect, indicating a potential for liability to occur.

liable

A shorter, more direct term indicating legal responsibility.

responsible for

Shifts the focus to responsibility, which often implies liability.

accountable for

Similar to "responsible for", emphasizing the obligation to answer for potential damages or wrongdoings.

vulnerable to claims

Highlights the susceptibility to legal claims or lawsuits.

facing potential lawsuits

Specifically points out the possibility of legal action.

susceptible to legal action

Emphasizes a higher likelihood of facing legal consequences.

FAQs

How can I use "open to liability" in a sentence?

You can use "open to liability" to describe situations where someone or something is at risk of legal or financial responsibility. For example, "The lack of safety measures makes the company "open to liability" for workplace injuries."

What is a good alternative to "open to liability"?

Alternatives include "subject to liability", "exposed to liability", or simply "liable", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "open to liability" or "liable for"?

"Open to liability" suggests a potential for legal responsibility, while "liable for" indicates an existing or confirmed responsibility. For instance, someone might be "open to liability" for damages caused by their negligence, but they become "liable for" those damages once a court rules against them.

What does it mean to be "open to liability"?

To be "open to liability" means that an individual, organization, or entity is in a position where they could be held legally responsible for damages, losses, or other negative outcomes resulting from their actions or inactions. This does not necessarily mean that they are currently being sued or have been found responsible, but rather that the potential exists.