omitted to provide

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "omitted to provide" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "failed to provide" or "neglected to provide." Example: "The report was incomplete because the team omitted to provide the necessary data."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

"Except if otherwise provided in this will, I have intentionally omitted to provide herein for any of my heirs living at the date of my death," she wrote.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"I have intentionally and with full knowledge of the consequences omitted to provide for my niece," the will reads, "except for the gift of ten dollars".

The New York Times

According to contemporary newspaper reports, he complained on only one occasion, during a performance at the Newport Lyceum on 18 April 1905: "They had omitted to provide air holes, and as Houdini, who has his share of humour, quietly remarked that he needed air sometimes, there was little delay while the holes were made". His programme would also include a company of popular vaudeville acts.

BBC

Davis said in the 10-page will, dated Sept. 2, 1987: "I declare that I have intentionally and with full knowledge omitted to provide herein for my daughter, Margo, and my daughter, Barbara, and-or my grandsons, Ashley Hyman and Justin Hyman". Davis' adopted son, Michael Woodman Merrill of Chestnut Hill, Mass., receives about half the estate, which totals between $600,000 and $1 million.

Los Angeles Times

The primary antibodies were omitted to provide negative controls.

Blood Cancer Journal

It is, however, possible that authors have described a needle technique using the language of a TA model and omitted to provide a rationale for their point selection.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Three companies were found guilty of breaching health and safety legislation by omitting to provide barriers, resulting in Deverson Direct Ltd being ordered to pay a fine of £50,000, J Murphy and Sons Ltd £25,000, and Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft £25,000.

Wikipedia

In observational studies, staff may omit to provide potential respondents with information about the study.

BMC Medical Ethics

This could be because a clinician who failed to record the next appointment date on the patient's chart might also omit to provide written or verbal information for the patient about the specific date of the next visit.

BMC Public Health

Each state respectively shall have the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, its own militia, whensoever Congress shall omit or neglect to provide for the same.

University of Chicago

That each state respectively shall have the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining its own militia, whensoever Congress shall omit or neglect to provide for the same.

University of Chicago

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing, prefer using more standard phrases like "failed to provide" or "neglected to provide" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "omitted to provide" in formal contexts as it is not considered standard English. Opt for clearer and more accepted alternatives to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "omitted to provide" functions as a purpose connector, indicating the reason or intention behind an omission. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not considered correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Wiki

5%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "omitted to provide" appears in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. Ludwig AI suggests using alternatives such as "failed to provide" or "neglected to provide" for better clarity and correctness. Its usage spans across science, news, and academic contexts, but its non-standard nature makes it less suitable for formal writing. Therefore, opting for more accepted alternatives is advisable to maintain a professional tone. Always prefer "failed to provide".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to supply

Replaces "omitted" with "failed" and "provide" with "supply", indicating a lack of providing something.

neglected to furnish

Substitutes "omitted" with "neglected" and "provide" with "furnish", emphasizing a careless oversight.

failed to deliver

Replaces "provide" with "deliver", indicating a failure in the act of delivering something.

did not supply

Uses a more direct and simple phrasing to indicate a lack of supply.

neglected to give

Emphasizes a lack of attention in providing something, using simpler vocabulary.

failed to offer

Focuses on the failure to present or offer something that was needed.

did not furnish

A more formal alternative to "did not supply", highlighting a lack of proper arrangement or provision.

neglected to present

Similar to "neglected to give", but with a focus on the act of presenting or showcasing something.

declined to provide

Indicates a deliberate refusal to provide something, rather than an oversight.

refused to supply

Similar to "declined to provide", but with an emphasis on a firm and intentional refusal.

FAQs

What does "omitted to provide" mean?

The phrase "omitted to provide" means that someone failed to supply or offer something that was expected or needed. While understandable, it's not considered grammatically correct in standard English.

What can I say instead of "omitted to provide"?

You can use alternatives like "failed to provide", "neglected to provide", or "did not provide depending on the context".

Is "omitted to provide" grammatically correct?

No, "omitted to provide" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "failed to provide" or "neglected to provide".

Which is correct, "omitted to provide" or "failed to provide"?

"Failed to provide" is the correct and more widely accepted phrase. While "omitted to provide" might be understood, it is not standard English.