omit to include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'omit to include' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to explain that something was excluded in order to accommodate the inclusion of something else. For example: "In order to include the new feature, we had to omit the manual update process".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

They omit to include the large number of Geoffrey-Boycottian locals who can do the same without even making you crane your neck.

The Guardian - Travel

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Inadequate, she felt, for the authors had omitted to include references to Ariosto's Orlando Furioso.

The Guardian - Books

Social media platforms should also disclose the use of lookalike audiences for targeting political ads at users, she said today — a data-point that Facebook has nonetheless omitted to include in its newly launched political ad disclosure system.

TechCrunch

As such, labeling of one antigen needed to be omitted to include WWOX.

Plosone

If one for example omits to include 'Quality and Outcomes Framework' (QOF), one fails to identify dozens of relevant studies.

BMC Health Services Research

Although our study results were adjusted for several essential socioeconomic indicators, it is worth noting that we have omitted to include parameters pertaining to the father's situation.

BMJ Open

We have also omitted to include any variable concerning family income specifying the number and type of salaries per family, instead of income levels.

BMJ Open

We omitted to include receptionists in our focus groups – for future work, arrangements would be made to ensure that reports of their experiences of administering the questionnaires would be explored.

BMC Family Practice

Correction to: British Journal of Cancer (2011) 104, 1410 1417; doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.94 When published originally, earlier in Volume 104, the authors noticed that they had omitted to include TRDRP grant (19XT-0051) in the acknowledgements, which funded a large portion of the work for this paper.

British Journal of Cancer

The book fails to note that the original policy list of the Washington consensus (a term it omits to define) included a "competitive exchange rate".

The Economist

In our study, using the Mayo Clinic algorithm for omitting lymphadenectomy to include endometrioid histology, grade 1 or grade 2 tumors, myometrial invasion less than or equal to 50% and no evidence of any metastatic disease at the time of surgery [ 16], the sensitivity, specificity, false positive and false negative rates are 71.8%, 80.2%, 76.7% and 2.8%, respectively.

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "omit to include" when you want to emphasize the trade-off between excluding something to make way for something else. It is particularly useful when space or resources are limited.

Common error

Avoid using "omit to include" if you are simply excluding something without a specific intention of adding something else in its place. Use a simple "omit" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "omit to include" functions as a purpose connector, indicating that something is being deliberately left out to facilitate the inclusion of something else. Ludwig confirms the phrase is grammatically correct. It emphasizes a trade-off or exchange.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "omit to include" is a grammatically correct but uncommon expression used to explain a decision where something is excluded to make room for something else. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, it serves to justify choices by emphasizing the trade-off between exclusion and inclusion. While grammatically sound, consider alternatives like "exclude in favor of including" or "leave out to make room for" to ensure clarity and impact. When using this phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates that the omission directly enables the inclusion.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

omit in order to add

This alternative maintains a very similar structure but uses "in order to" for a slightly more formal tone.

exclude in favor of including

Highlights the preference of one element over another, implying a conscious choice to include something by excluding something else.

leave out to make room for

Emphasizes spatial or conceptual limitations that necessitate the omission to create space for something new.

remove to accommodate

Focuses on the act of taking something away to provide space or resources for another element.

drop for the sake of adding

Indicates that something is being given up or sacrificed to allow something else to be added.

forego to incorporate

Implies a voluntary decision to give up something to integrate something new or different.

cut to integrate

Suggests streamlining a process by removing elements, allowing for new components to be added, often related to content.

sacrifice to feature

Shows an element being deliberately omitted so that another can be given prominence.

eject to insert

This version uses more forceful verbs to show the act of removing an item.

suppress to encompass

This phrase uses stronger language, denoting a deliberate effort to contain or subdue an element in order to include or surround other elements.

FAQs

How can I use "omit to include" in a sentence?

You can use "omit to include" to explain that something was excluded in order to accommodate the inclusion of something else. For instance, "We had to omit the detailed explanations /s/in+order+to include the new diagrams".

What does "omit to include" mean?

The phrase "omit to include" means to purposefully leave something out so that something else can be included or given more space, attention, or resources.

What are some alternatives to "omit to include"?

Some alternatives include "exclude in favor of including", "leave out to make room for", or "remove to accommodate", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "omit to include"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct, although not very common. It follows the structure of expressing a purpose or condition for an action.